superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square229fedilinkarrow-up11.53Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.51Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square229fedilink
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down1·2 days agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·2 days agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.