• @Ethalis
    link
    English
    402 months ago

    You should always start your argument with an ad hominem and, if it doesn’t work, slowly work your way towards insulting your interlocutor, the highest form of rethoric

    • BountifulEggnog [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i’M mR EtHaLis fRoM SoME rAnDOm JeRk Off wEbSitE YoU’vE NevEr HeArD oF aNd i’M sO sMaRT i kNoW hOW tO DebAte PEopLe On tHe iNteRnEt.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 months ago

        No no, that’s name calling already, you jumped straight to the top. You need to cloak your disdain in a civil tone, because remember the next step is going to tone policing. So something like, “I don’t think you have a lot of experience arguing on the internet seeing as you come from a much smaller instance.” is much better bait.

            • BountifulEggnog [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I thought it was a joke about starting an argument with an ad hominem.

              :smuglord: actually, I think you’ll find that I did attack him personally instead of his underlying points, which according to rationalwiki, counts.

              spoiler

              It was/is but your bit was better. Admitting being wrong isn’t a step though. That’s also why I deleted it until you responded because I realized I’m not funny 😢

              • mathemachristian [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                62 months ago

                kubrick-stare Where are the FACTS and LOGIC??

                spoiler

                The issue with ironic shitposting in a nutshell. I’m going to tap out though before we are under so many layers of irony the whole thing caves in