If I understand this right, it’s not really it. If you delete messages in the chat, they will also disappear from the backup as it gets uploaded again.
This doesn’t seem to be an archiving solution.
If I understand this right, it’s not really it. If you delete messages in the chat, they will also disappear from the backup as it gets uploaded again.
This doesn’t seem to be an archiving solution.
Heck are those flags?
The video is by Benn Jordan, I wholeheartedly recommend this video and entire channel. Guy is a world treasure.
Bruh, can’t have cat permadeath because 9 lives. Also there’s plenty of procedural goodness with that bouncy string.
If daily mail readers could read, they’d be very angry.
You made two comments, both edgy, without indicting sarcasm in any way.
Downvotes don’t matter much on lemmy, so don’t worry about it.
No, just be honest. “Bloomberg fradulent copyright strike on our black market documentary”.
Still one sentence.
I use a Firefox extension called Dearrow because of this understandable, but unfortunate trend.
Hey thanks for engaging with me.
I think we are aligned with our views on the topic, including the Missisipi solution being generally bad.
Being a dad I am beginning the struggle for well being of a soon-to-be a social media user, and it scares me as hell.
My conviction is to be present, guiding and hoping to teach enough before they stop listening to me.
Totally agree. This is corpo, government doing stuff because they can, disregarding law they would have you uphold because you’re beneath them.
Corruption. Plain and simple.
Title is clickbait, because a sentence like that without context is alarmist.
It’s not wrong, it’s mentioned and explained in the video, byt it’s still clickbait.
The story here is Bloomberg fuckery and the copyright strike, not the imminent channel deletion.
My opinion: no. Children under certain age have no capacity to detect malice or disinformation when interacting with others, especially adults and algorithms bent on harm.
Hell, most adults probably aren’t. But as long as a child has a guardian, it’s the guardian’s responsibility to teach, guide and protect.
Letting a child lose into the internet is harmful, just like letting one out into a city.
I don’t think age verification is a particularly good tool to enforce that, but I don’t know what is, on a societal level.
I do agree with the stated goals tho.
Interesting framing “reduced rights”. I think some laws should reduce what minors can or must do - like laws preventing marriage or work of minors, for their own benefit - compulsory elementary education for one.
Do you think that preventing children (idk what age Mississippi set for their law) from accessing social media is wrong? (And I don’t mean unlawful, specifically unconstitutional.)
From their effectiveness I’d say VDV looked better in music videos than fought on the battlefield.
How to avoid being hit in your presence then?
Oh oh. “I know a little bit about almost anything”
The carp stands up.
I’m obviously whatever you would like me to be.
Not profit, speculative profit. Buy low sell cheap. Years of steady growth dividends are gone and so does long term consequences.
GDPR prevents using underhanded tactics to assume consent for this type of use.
Huh this is few kernel versions back. I haven’t had a kernel panic in years, will have to simulate one and see if fedora supports this.