Weird, I never got that consistenc off them. I thought they were really good! Also, the sausages are great!

People speaking on their phone using a loudspeaker.

People who don’t understand basic elevator etiquette and attempt to walk in before people get off.

People who play Karaoke loud enough for anyone outside of their home to hear.

People who drive two motorbikes / bicycles beside each other and talk, thereby blocking traffic.

People who cut in line.

People who don’t clean up after their pets.

People who get angry at the animals and not the owners for the above.

People who display a total ignorance of the most basic facts regarding other countries.

Dysfunctionally incompetent and/or lazy staff (beyond what is acceptable for low income workers).

Bureaucrats who clearly prioritise covering their ass over performing the most basic functions of their job.

People who are rude/dismissive to others who are smaller/weaker/meeker than them.

Racist taxi drivers.

Asshole bus drivers.

People who don’t apologise when they are wrong and know it.

I can think of more but I’ll stop there.

Are you saying that if NYT wants to continue to be relavent then they should agree?

If Thor had managed to lift the cat completely from the ground, he would have altered the boundaries of the universe.

That’s hardcore.

This is fantastic. Thank you. I didn’t know EFF provided this service.

The Iranian story is that she suffered a breakdown from stress and anxiety. The immediate western story was that she was doing this as protest after the police took her hijab or told her to put one on, they don’t seem to know either.

Spivak talks about this in Can the Subaltern Speak. She can conform to islamist misogyny or ‘liberate’ through western sexualisation. But she can never express herself outside of these opresssive paradigms.

Humans already rape animals on an industrial scale. That’s what artificial insemination is. Religion didn’t stop that.

Also, I don’t think the cows are really into it.

Can’t say I like the art here. What’s going on with Supes face?

Wait, you’re playing the OG (pre-Fallout) Wasteland? What’s that like?

I supposed I expected swedes.

Drag is using a first person pronoun just like you might write “I”.

Why does drag refer to drag’s self in this way?

Also, drag’s name is not Dragon Rider. Unless that drag was referring to drag’s chosen name?

Imagine the level of chill you have to reach to notice a hornet in your car and just be like ‘Oh hey buddy’.

Yeah, I’ve found myself wasting quite a lot of time thinking of the ‘perfect regex’ for task X only to realise that I could have avoided doing so by simply taking a different approach.

GTA Chinatown Wars probably got most of its promotion from the South Park episode where Cartman really wants it.

What do you mean? We just outsource the waste management to private companies who assure us they will dispose of it in a safe and secure manner. (This is legitimately what America does with nuclear waste, with limited oversight – fuck you Regan – and it is fucking bananas).

I know. I didn’t say this was OOP, I said this was your brain when you OD on OOP. While we are not dealing with objects, I’d argue that the kind of approach that would lead one to needlessly overcompartmentalise code like this is the product of having a little too much OOP.

This is your brain when you OD on OOP.

This reminds me of a one of Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion. The following is from the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy:

Suppose a very fast runner—such as mythical Atalanta—needs to run for the bus. Clearly before she reaches the bus stop she must run half-way, as Aristotle says. There’s no problem there; supposing a constant motion it will take her 1/2 the time to run half-way there and 1/2 the time to run the rest of the way. Now she must also run half-way to the half-way point—i.e., a 1/4 of the total distance—before she reaches the half-way point, but again she is left with a finite number of finite lengths to run, and plenty of time to do it. And before she reaches 1/4 of the way she must reach 1/2 of 1/4=1/8 of the way; and before that a 1/16; and so on. There is no problem at any finite point in this series, but what if the halving is carried out infinitely many times? The resulting series contains no first distance to run, for any possible first distance could be divided in half, and hence would not be first after all. However it does contain a final distance, namely 1/2 of the way; and a penultimate distance, 1/4 of the way; and a third to last distance, 1/8 of the way; and so on. Thus the series of distances that Atalanta is required to run is: …, then 1/16 of the way, then 1/8 of the way, then 1/4 of the way, and finally 1/2 of the way (for now we are not suggesting that she stops at the end of each segment and then starts running at the beginning of the next—we are thinking of her continuous run being composed of such parts). And now there is a problem, for this description of her run has her travelling an infinite number of finite distances, which, Zeno would have us conclude, must take an infinite time, which is to say it is never completed. And since the argument does not depend on the distance or who or what the mover is, it follows that no finite distance can ever be traveled, which is to say that all motion is impossible. (Note that the paradox could easily be generated in the other direction so that Atalanta must first run half way, then half the remaining way, then half of that and so on, so that she must run the following endless sequence of fractions of the total distance: 1/2, then 1/4, then 1/8, then ….)

I can’t remember where but I remember reading US agencies use tools and methods to disguise their hacks by leaving the ‘fingerprints’ of adversary state groups from places like Russia and NK. Not saying that’s what happening here but I thought it was cool (and kinda scary).