SadArtemis🏳️‍⚧️

She/Her, certified AmeriKKKa hater (all my homies hate AmeriKKKa)

Moving partially to Hexbear for the emojis and larger community (I’ll still be here and using this acc)

  • 9 Posts
  • 364 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
  • I get it sucks that they are walling us off from there users, however we cannot do much

    Does it suck? Personally it sucks more to breathe the same air or exist in the same spaces as these libs. Let them wall themselves off, eventually they will be walled off from the vast majority of humanity that is looking on in disgust at them- and then hopefully in time that wall will close in, and those who cannot develop the human decency to leave their wretched spaces will go straight to the dustbin of history.





  • Lolicon isn’t just porn, but attraction towards children in general, is it not?

    Yes and no, “loli” is the… genre if you will. The terminally online/creepy/anime way of calling it. Calling people or kids it in general is just plain wrong honestly IMO. The “attraction towards children” is pedophilia

    There’s no gunning for undertones. If you replace the cartoon image with an actual photograph of a child it should be obvious.

    Once again, cartoon. Not to say that makes “everything ok” but at some point you need to touch grass

    The age of the commenters is irrelevant.

    As for this… seriously? They were cringe but this is equally cringe. Basically at some point… you get my gist

    c) The OC was likely created by an adult

    I don’t see how this has anything to do with the subject matter?


  • Even calling it “loli” is problematic and if anything the creepier thing, but IMO

    (A) in the genchat we talked about the age of those two posters (my comment on the other hand was “sure kill me” but less explicit as it’s the grad)

    (B) the line drawn is iffy with age (not an Evangelion fan so didn’t know she’s 14) but even then at some point, considering the artstyle and that we’re literally gunning for “undertones” at this point I think we need to touch grass.

    © I agree the grad is really not the place for this sorts of things though



  • While they certainly exist, the Communist Party of Britain thankfully is not among them: https://archive.ph/F1Ow4

    The Communist Party of Britain affirmed that it supports transgender people’s right to “live equal, full and meaningful lives” after J.K. Rowling, almost as well known at this point for her hatred of trans women as for penning the mega-popular Harry Potter series, expressed tacit support for its candidates. On Saturday, Rowling encouraged her social media followers to vote Communist, a move made in response to the anti-trans feminist group For Women Scotland tweeting that a party spokesperson had told them it stood “in support of [recognizing] the nature of biological sex.” A day later, a statement was released on the party’s official X account clarifying the matter. “For avoidance of doubt, the Communist Party supports the right of trans people to medically transition, to have access to healthcare and live equal, full and meaningful lives, socially, economically and politically,” it said. “We believe that such liberation will only be possible under socialism.” Rowling’s blessing, likely now to be rescinded, came after she published an op-ed in The Times of London on Friday disavowing the Labour Party over its support for trans rights.






  • Y’know, I could understand if this was about “eeeliteees” and the “satanic liberal cabals” or whatever. I wouldn’t agree with it, but I could at least understand (so long as it didn’t stray into antisemitism), considering the blatant wickedness of the system- its not like it would make the western elites any worse if they ate a few of their millions of victims here and there, everyone knows they’re genocidal baby killers and worse (even if people may disagree on the specifics of who and what is victimized).

    But no, apparently it’s blood libel against Haitians again. At first I thought it was incredibly racist but coming out of nowhere/utterly ridiculous (still is), but if this “baby/flesh eating” nonsense is going to be a running thing, that’s gone far past “cats and dogs” (already racist and blood libel-adjacent imo, as an Asian) and well into the territory of “inciting pogroms/lynchings.”




  • I, personally, would be very hesitant to point someone to Rumble (or Twitch) in general, rather than to specific channels, whether they’re on Rumble or Twitch.

    Same, though as I see it that extends to all large western platforms, really. Twitch is generally more inoffensive (because its focus tends to be gaming, and so long as one avoids the chuds most channels are more apolitical than ghoulish), that said.

    I didn’t exactly find the leftist channels I mentioned on Rumble, admittedly- they’re the reasons I use it (Syrianalysis and Richard Medhurst are demonetized, and now I suppose Africa Stream is banned on YT). I basically followed channels I had already been watching on YouTube, as a backup (or to support the creators who were being repressed by YT)


  • If you think that there is no capacity of leftist infiltration on Twitch, you’re wrong (see: all of the leftist streamers I listed above). And if you think that Rumble has any potential to harbor leftist content, you are wrong again.

    So, twitch, owned by Bezos, which complies with US repression is “open to leftist infiltration,” but Rumble, owned by Thiel, is not?

    I use both platforms, and I know of several leftist Rumble channels (Syrianalysis, Richard Medhurst, Danny Haiphong, Geopolitical Economy Report). Does that disprove your claims, or is the whole “Twitch is open to leftist infiltration because there are some leftists” bunk? (Frankly I think anywhere is open to leftist infiltration- right up until it isn’t, something that all imperial core-owned platforms can and will be subjected to)

    Twitch is more geared towards livestreams, also, whereas more… journalistic, academic, or analysis-focused content fits more with the Rumble/YouTube format.




  • Couldn’t be bothered to watch the vid, but I think that- of course, on one hand, diversity and inclusion is always a good thing. And conscious, genuine progressivism is too.

    On the other hand, there is a very clear and (IMO) undeniable grifting industry of “wokeness,” which has appropriated the term (and maybe could be said to have predominantly usurped it) from its original contexts, to ply it for capital and virtue signalling (the liberal ie. capitalist equivalent of jerking themselves off to how great and enlightened they are- which naturally also then immediately gets used against all the “unwashed, colored, etc masses who are so barbaric and in need of western liberal civilization.”)

    Everyone can see this, one would have to be willfully ignorant not to see this. Western capital can congratulate themselves and flaunt how superior they are by making a play where historical slave owners and genocidaires are black and brown (how progressive!), turning a cartoon mermaid into a black woman (nothing wrong with that, but everyone knows the reboots suck- and no, global audiences having no interest does not mean they are somehow “racist”), or- as an example of the heights of barbarism they can utilize this for- bringing in the first black figurehead (POTUS) to destroy Africa’s most developed country, destroy black wealth/homeownership, engage in countless war crimes against black and brown people, and “pivot to Asia” to attempt to destroy the brightest light of development and recovery of the non-white, colonized, exploited peoples. Hell, capitalist virtue signaling can even be used to (and is widely being used to) whitewash literal industrial genocide and a white (ethnically Jewish) supremacist, apartheid ethnostate, as in the case of Isntreal. It can be used to whitewash literal, genuine, goosestepping Nazis (not neo-Nazis, Nazis) like those in Ukraine.

    The “sweet baby inc” debacle strikes me as pretty characteristic of this… “virtue industry” (which has no relation whatsoever to actual virtue and actually oftentimes contains an immense degree of deeply “unvirtuous” western chauvinism). For all that I’ve seen it strikes me as a issue of western faux-progressive liberal smuglords, trying to extort a dev from the other side of the world (China), failing, and crying about it to their fellow nepotists/western media circlejerkers that tout themselves as “journalism” (same as with world news journalism or any other kind of journalism- the west loves to get their nasty, grubby hands on it and claim to be the authority of all that is good and bad, true and untrue). And it strikes me also as western “journalism”- of which “gaming journalism/media” does not exist in some vacuum, or isolated from the collective west and western “journalistic” circles- collectively joining hands to shit on, falsify, slander, and wildly misrepresent the history and present reality of a Chinese gaming studio, as well as statements purportedly said (and mistranslated).

    So- yes, “woke” liberal media sucks. Not because they have a veneer of “diversity and inclusivity” (these things are genuinely positive), but because they’re the self-masturbatory abortions of the most deluded and smug of the vaunted capitalist “intelligentsia,” generally lacking any authenticity, substance, or anything beyond the omnipresent smugness of its creators.

    Actual woke (diverse, inclusive, actually progressive) media is awesome. The shit spewed by liberal smuglords has no relation (at most, it’s trying to appropriate and imitate- and failing hilariously).