That kind of blew my mind.

Oh, that’s simple. They are idiots that don’t understand the product they sell.

Imagine that you are a best in the word graphic designer. And you have to sell your logo to someone, who literally don’t see the difference between quality work and the logo that their nice did in ms paint.

In their mind those are the same picture, so why should they invest in you while you are 300x more expensive?

The don’t see it, so their use data - that they also don’t understand - to look for X factors and came up with idiotic conclusions like “star trek movies with older first captains perform better than movies with younger first capitan, so good script should have old one” or “movies with 3 joks per 5-minutes performe better than movies with one joke per 5 minutes”… or “jar-jar bings”…

When future comic book author of the masterpiece Bone finaly got his 5-minute meeting with publisher who was basicly a godfather-legend-who-is-who off paperstrips he heard “you should redraw all your comics so all speech-bubbles are thought-bubbles. Garfield uses thought-bubbles, and it’s so successful”.

It’s the same reason why all all translations are shit now. People who decide are not literate enough to distinguish nuances of top-level translations from product if Google translate.

You’re thinking additional 30k to make sure that a script is good is rounding error in the cost of the movie. They are thinking, typing one page should take like 10-minuts right? So with $15/h…"

Remember, for them LOTR and Hobbit are “just as good” sources for epic blockbuster trilogy.

They are literally quality-blind. Cust-cutting is all they bring to the table.

One part of the problem, that he’s completely missing is that those are are not fairly competing free market prices. Many of those hegemons like Google gain their positions using what basicly is dumping pricess. They are loosing moment or Gmail, Maps, Drive, Gemini (AI), and many more “free or cheep”. Competitors are buried, bought on, copied, or starved as they need to.compeat with someone who is willing to burn millions. So many services that are leaders in their fields didn’t deliver a single dollar of profit yet. Their literal business plan is “we will take it all back once no one will have a choice anymore”

“Just find a way to compete” is basicly victim blaming at this point.

You’re describing my Facebook wall.

Hahahahahaha

Do you remember when writers strike, and the producents paid to cut leafs of trees, to denny them comfort of marching in shadow? It seems there is no limit of how much corporations are willing to pay to get rid of the inconveniences of dealing with human beings.

It seems that AI is amazing tool, that is bound to be used to make everything worse.

So… did it work?

If you have this, you should have a sing-along blog as well.

I think that license similar to what D&D has is having a cake and eating a cake. You open your word to be used which grows the community, but you remain the control on key characters and aspects, so your onwers intrests are protected.

Amazing

Thank you. I have trouble navigating peertube and finding good content and this is a step in the right direction.

Thanks

Can someone please provide the context what epsilon and phi suppose to represent and why they are 4 and 1/4?

Gold.

Proton Pass has a feature exactly for that. You can create unlimited number of aliases, and kill ones that bacame compromised.

Hmm, it feels like there is more to the story. Yes, the inconveniences and someonsticles are expected. Otherwise it would be a boycot. But I’m inclined to give your mum benefits of the doubt, and wonder how much it affect you’d day-to-day life and your mental health. It’s OK to take a step beck and reevaluate where you take the hits.

Boycott is like diet, the best one is one that you can fallow trought. You droping just some key US products continously would be more effective than going 100% cold turkey and burn down. If you change only the “easy wins” it’ll still be impactful.

Take care of yourself, so you’ll be able to take care od others.

There is simpler explanation. People who watched this video acvtualy buy the product more often then people who didn’t.

So it flaged you as someone potentially interested and selected you when advertisers chose to target people similar to their actuall historical clients.

(I’m not saying they don’t scan videos. I’m saying they don’t have to do it to achieve effect like this)

I belive it was memicaly hot for one third of the second and it died in flames. I’m surprised it still exist.