Mastodon: @greg@clar.ke
What’s the context here?
What kind of fees are you paying? That chart does not reflect the market. For instance, if you had invested in a low management fee S&P 500 index find you would expect to have seen a 50% increase over the same period.
*Index funds with low management fees
Yay! I’m in! I’m very excited about this
Never trust big tooth fairy
Use my fancy tea cup at work
Lol, exactly and the CDC advisory is for 10 states
This person should text-to-speech this tweet on public transport
I called out ShareMySims specifically for making woke-bigoted statements in the original thread about these ghost clowns. Maybe narrow-progressive is a better term.
Either way, I 100% agree that dressing up as ghosts to go and vote is a stupid thing to do.
Do you have any evidence this was election interference? If not, this is speculation and a conspiracy theory.
A stance can be both woke and bigoted. One example that COP exhibited is assuming that US race relations are universal around the world. It’s often from well meaning folks that just have a very narrow perspective.
Just admit when you’re wrong and stop the woke-bigotry
It’s scary how quickly people assume conspiracy
I’m not arguing they should be wearing masks in a polling station
I think it’s reasonable to expect people in a voting location to be clearly visible and recognizable
I agree (in most cases). I’m arguing that these folks are more likely stupid than malicious.
By that logic the Pope and the Michelin man look like a members of the KKK
This is a bit of hyperbole. If there where trying to intimidate voters they wouldn’t dress up like ghosts. Stay vigilant but didn’t label everything as a conspiracy, some people are just stupid.
edit: I don’t live in the US but I have spent a lot of time there. The vast majority of Americans are great people. From an outside perspective, it’s a little disturbing to see how quickly this thread devolved into conspiracy. Hanlon’s razor and all that. Focus on the many actual threats to US democracy instead of paranoid ghost hunting.
We need shared definitions to tell meaningful stories with our data. And then use a company specific example like how a customer’s journey can not be understood with differing definition between marketing and sales. The marketing team can’t measure the quality of the leads they’re producing unless they can directly link a customer’s whole journey from acquisition to churn. Otherwise it’s just vanity metrics. But don’t be too harsh, vanity metrics are really common in business. A company needs strong data leadership to create a culture of using data to justify decisions to a culture of using data to inform decisions.
Lol, I think that was BTKFS but maybe I should switch just to be safe
Where did you get this part?