

Write your own OS and software then. Your hardware is running someone else’s software otherwise, so no you don’t get to control every aspect of what it does.
Oh hi there person who I’ve upset by expressing my opinion who is now wanting to go back through my post history to find something to use against me! If you’re reading this, it’s because you’ve already lost the argument :)
Write your own OS and software then. Your hardware is running someone else’s software otherwise, so no you don’t get to control every aspect of what it does.
So you don’t even know and didn’t bother to check if it is on-device before attacking it for not being on-device?
Recall is done on-client.
Windows “stealthed” recall onto people’s machines? What? It was a hugely advertised feature, exclusive to only the new copilot+ machines, and was an opt-in test feature lol
So you’ve never wanted to find an article/headline that you vaguely remember seeing? Or a product that you looked at? Or a picture that you looked at?
There absolutely is a use case for full reachability of everything you’ve done on your computer. Git commits and terminal history and “recent” files list don’t even come close to providing the same thing lol
Sure, but the Redmagic doesn’t have things the Samsung does - one of which seems to be a dealbreaker for you, the built in stylus.
So they were sabotaging nasa for all those years before SpaceX was a thing for what reason?
You have any links to support that it’s just cheap materials causing the failures?
They didn’t circumvent the issue - they did what Microsoft tell developers to do in regards to their programs and recall lol.
This is just a thinly veiled ad for AdGuard.
If you would get that why wouldn’t you just get a Galaxy S2X Ultra?
So you think those privately funded politicians should be in charge of the state of SpaceX?
Your comment says yes.
It’s almost like it was by design.
They also just spy on their own citizens anyway, because who is going to stop them?
Ideological reasons? You think nasa hasn’t made reusable self landing rockets and boosters because of ideological reasons?
Sending something one way into space isn’t hard. Having it come back is. Having it, and all the parts that it took to get it there and back, be safely returned to earth and able to be reused is stupidly hard.
What points are you talking about exactly?
That’s not putting eggs in a basket, that’s just wasteful government as always. The same government that you guys want to take control of SpaceX lol.
“Turning into” lol. The USA and all their partner countries like the ones in the 5 Eyes program have all been mass techno-surveillance states for decades.
Yeh the entire article is just an ad for AdGuard, using FUD to sell their product.