• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Some people think so. That doesn’t make it a good academic definition. You get into the shitty definition of socialism that Dr. Wolff mocks:

      “When the government that’s a lot of stuff, that’s socialism. And the more stuff it does, the more socialist it gets. And when it does a reeeeeal whole lot of stuff, then that’s communism”

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The academic definition would be the systems of the historical Eastern Bloc countries or a hypothetical society that has somehow completely abolished commodity production

        @leftymemes

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Rhetorically, it doesn’t matter how I define the term. It matters how people use it.

        The way I would define it is either the systems of historical Eastern Bloc countries or a hypothetical society that has somehow completely abolished commodity production

        @leftymemes