IDK, maybe when more people here are getting screwed over, libs will radicalize and get off their asses instead of trying to guilt us for not giving legitimacy unconditionally to their favorite “lesser evil” bourgeois party.

Of course, using their meager leverage to extract concessions from the people supposedly representing them never crosses their minds…

Also imagine having the audacity to call us privileged when you see what’s going on in Gaza as a “single issue” instead of an escalation of violence by the ruling class that can and will go back to us.

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Accelerationism is using power or influence to make conditions worse, under the assumption that worse conditions will lead to radical outcomes. We have no power or influence to begin with. What you’re describing is schadenfreude.

    Accelerationism itself is basically is a myth made up by liberals. It implies the left has the power to make everyone’s life substantially worse on a material basis, but every indication shows whatever meager amount of power the left has at its disposal is spent on the exact opposite - things like mutual aid, labor organizing, literacy, political analysis, etc.

    • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      The idea of accelerationism goes back quite a bit more actually. For instance, marx once remarked that he will be voting in favour of free trade because it will speed up the contradictions of capitalism.

      Accerlationism as making conditions worse to induce radicalise is a gibberish ideology, but accelerationism as making use of capitalism’s few “progressive” tendencies is standard marxist practice. Dengism can also be viewed as the latter type of accelerationism.