Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agoBut at what cost?hexbear.netimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1135arrow-down11
arrow-up1134arrow-down1imageBut at what cost?hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·5 months agoI see that Economist finally got honest about their own motto
minus-squareBeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·5 months agoMakes me wonder if this screencap is fake.
minus-squarecontext [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·5 months agonope! that is an accurate depiction lmao https://www.economist.com/china/2021/06/22/chinas-average-retirement-age-is-ridiculously-low-54
minus-squarecombat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·5 months agoI think it’s a shitty pun about the subject of the article but damn it goes hard as an economist descriptor
minus-squarewheresmysurplusvalue [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-25 months agoThat’s hilarious
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoThe only thing that would have been better is “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”
I see that Economist finally got honest about their own motto
Makes me wonder if this screencap is fake.
nope! that is an accurate depiction lmao
https://www.economist.com/china/2021/06/22/chinas-average-retirement-age-is-ridiculously-low-54
lmao holy shit
I think it’s a shitty pun about the subject of the article but damn it goes hard as an economist descriptor
That’s hilarious
The only thing that would have been better is “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”