• taanegl
    link
    fedilink
    12 hours ago

    This is what corporate speech control looks like, kids. Not even once.

  • @brsrklf
    link
    37
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Until they give a “better” reason, I am going to assume the one they hinted at is true, and Microsoft just decided that it was worthless because it wasn’t “Mikami’s studio” anymore. Honestly, I already suspected it.

    In which case, fuck them. These games were not made by one person, a studio is bigger than its director. And the rest of them didn’t get even one chance to prove themselves.

    Truly shows how little they value the people who make their games.

  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 days ago

    i think it was just standard politics, everybody had to take a haircut, and nobody in leadership wanted to fight for that studio, it didn’t have a patron/protector. It got killed because no executive was championing it, not because it was bad.

    • @Hdcase@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      78 days ago

      I’m surprised Aaron Greenberg didn’t fight for it, since according to him their last game smashed every metric and exceeded all expectations.

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 days ago

        While he did say those things, it doesn’t mean anyone was willing to fight for it internally. This is why many external companies that do so well on the open market die and wither after they get acquired by big companies. Internal politics don’t have to be rational externally.

      • kbin_space_program
        link
        fedilink
        58 days ago

        It could be that its success was internally attributed to a different team someone in the hierarchy favoured.