Sony Pictures is reportedly exploring the possibility of a new take on Joel Schumacher’s 1985 ‘Brat Pack’ classic “St. Elmo’s Fire”. The project would hinge on being able to reunite original cast members Andrew McCarthy, Emilio Estevez, Rob Lowe, Demi Moore, Judd Nelson, Ally Sheedy and Mare Winningham. Schumacher and Carl Kurlander co-wrote the film […]
I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.
I’m not automatically against sequels, but do we really need a sequel to a 40 year old movie?
Idk, which is worse a remake or a delayed sequel? Or are they both on the same level?
That’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.
I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.