• SOMETHINGSWRONG@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I have some reservations (need to research her more) as she was relatively progressive in an American context it seems.

      If anyone has more starting points for my research, I am absolutely open.

      However, for the moment she’s a “NO” from me. Even at the most forgiving judgements, it seems she sent away a whole bunch of poor people and did nothing about the system that is driving them to crime.

      Ah also her weird racism, nepotism, and stances on LGBT issues. Who refers to art in their home by the ethnicity of the artist???

      • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Another one for you. As a Californian, we knew she was bad. That’s why she dropped out polling 5th in the primary.

        The Human Costs Of Kamala Harris’ War On Truancy. The “progressive prosecutor” wanted to transform how California responded to students missing school. Parents like Cheree Peoples wound up paying the price.

        https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-harris-truancy-arrests-2020-progressive-prosecutor_n_5c995789e4b0f7bfa1b57d2e

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Good info on her background, thank you! As a former Orange resident this is especially disappointing to read this story and how the mother and child were treated.

          Harris has since replaced her punitive stance with the message that parents of truant children need help, not scare tactics. It’s a shift that happened roughly in step with voters’ waning tolerance for using the criminal justice system to address complicated social problems and Harris’ own preparations to seek higher office.

          Emphasis mine

          She’s a cop, down to her core. She’s got the mentality that “I can fix social problems through the threat and use of coercive state violence”. That was her law, that she asked for, I assumed drafted/guided, and defended publicly… until she ran for the Oval Office, and was made to choose compassion.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          It was wild to see how fast the hype around her candidacy deflated. Admittedly, I got wrapped up in it up until I heard her talk for the second time.

      • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        She did something about the system. She defended it. On two occasions she opposed the release of people who had convictions overturned by demonstrating actual innocence to appellate courts on the basis of legal technicalities, in both cases her office argued that they had waited too long to file a petition to be released. Her office argued against the release of inmates eligible for parole after a federal court ruled that the extreme overcrowding in California prisons was cruel and unusual on the basis that releasing the prisoners would reduce prison labor.

        She helped with a cover up of an employee at the state crime lab who falsified testing results. The truth came out after the employee was arrested for stealing drugs from the lab and hundreds of convictions were overturned. She defended a police detective that falsified a confession to coerce a defendant into accepting a plea deal. She opposed requiring police to use body worn cameras. She opposed legislation that would have required her office to review police shootings.

        She consistently declined to investigate allegations of police and prosecutor misconduct including police shootings of unarmed people. Eventually she had to for the police, it got to the point that the justice department eventually stepped in to investigate an incident where a group of officers surrounded a mentally ill man with a steak knife and shot him 21 times after Harris refused to review the case. While she cooperated with the federal investigation into the police shooting, she backed the prosecutor who had his entire office removed from a case because of proven misconduct including hiding exonerating evidence.

      • Xerø@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Racism really? You mean being positive about being black? I only ever see bigots referring to black folk as racist.

          • Xerø@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, any human being is capable of bias. Racism requires institutional power.

            • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Agreed any human is capable of bias. Bias based on perceived differences. Some people make biased assumptions based on their perceiving of race.

    • Ramin Honary@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      She had a history of horrible policies.

      The idea that voters vote based on policy rather than loyalty is totally incomprehensible to the Democratic party.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Calling out Red MAGA is fine but don’t you dare call out Blue MAGA.

        Saying that Democrats will vote for literal Genocide if it means Republicans don’t win really hurts their feelings. And like the Republicans they will explain that if the other guy wins it would be worse.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes these are the same people that tell you that Biden hasn’t gotten anything impactful done because the president really doesn’t have that much power while following that up with claims that Trump would completely end democracy the minute he gets elected. This is a variation of an argument first coined by fascists who claim that their enemy is both weak and all powerful.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They keep saying that Democrats fall in love while Republicans fall in line, but clearly haven’t internalized it.

        Because Republicans clearly love Trump, and Democrats keep ordering their base to fall in line.