• Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You know what’s gonna improve Russia, China, Syria, Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, Palestine, North Korea, and all the other places liberals hate? Being pillaged by American and western European capitalists (in the case of Russia, being pillaged again). That definitely won’t create the type of crisis that’s perfect for promoting fascism.

        You’re right, if you’re worried about fascism you should definitely oppose an alliance between Russia and Cuba.

        Less sarcastically, I don’t know how old you are, but I’m old enough to remember seeing what the west did to the people of the Soviet Union. I know what they’re up to and the people of Russia, regardless of they’re government, do not deserve to go through that again. This is a world the US made, not Russia. If you don’t like capitalist restoration Russia you seriously need to ask if anything else is realistically possible in a world where they have to coexist with the US.

        • CamillePagliacci [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m learning that this place will excuse anything, including the violent suppression of communist by fascist movements and the US state department, as long as they can own the libs on the internet.

          The Russian state did not have to turn out this way. This was not an inevitability. It took work and years and years of effort by the shittiest human being imaginable to make it the way it is now. It is not excusable to spend 30 years suppressing workers and building yourself into exactly what the US wants you to be because the US has a lot of power to make communism difficult. If the Cubans right now gave up on the workers movement and embraced anti communism, neoliberal capitalism and reintroduced limits on minority rights, that would be a tremendous loss, not some kind of inevitable thing we should just shrug off because “well it’s easier to do that and you don’t want them to face what they did when the US was more actively suppressing them do you”.

          • coolusername@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            39
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Is this a gpt post where the bot is prompted to be an ultra but always reach the conclusion the CIA wants

          • YuccaMan [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you aren’t going to engage with what we’re saying regarding the necessity of what the Cuban government is doing, or even reckon with the historical realities of why Russia is the way it is, perhaps you would at least like to tell us what alternatives you see. Recall again this is all in the context of a world domimated by a hegemonic hyper-militarized state with nearly-unmitigated strike capacity that has proven itself eminently hostile to both governments.

            • CamillePagliacci [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think there’s a side in this discussion not reckoning with the historical reality of what Russia is, and it isn’t me. It really, really, really isn’t me.

              If you think the presence of Russia in a place will stop the US from interfering and trying to overthrow or remove that regime, you have not been following along. A Russian ship isn’t going to stop the US from embargoing them, it’s not going to stop them from trying to overthrow the country if they want to. Russian troops or deals with Russia haven’t stopped the US from doing so with any other latin american countries in the last decade.

              I don’t presume to know or be able to accurately strategize for the perfect thing to do. I don’t even necessarily oppose whatever Cuba is doing, since I don’t know what Cuba is planning against. I just know that relying on Russia has proven to not work, and I don’t like their government. If the Cubans find this to be the best option that’s obviously their choice, but I still won’t critically support comrade hitler.

              • YuccaMan [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                38
                ·
                5 months ago

                and I don’t like their government

                See, this is what it really comes down to, every time. You by your own admission have no idea where else Cuba might procure the things it needs to survive, but partnering with the Russians is verboten because you personally find it distasteful, regardless of the fact that no other willing assistance is forthcoming.

              • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                ·
                5 months ago

                So you don’t like this move purely because of Russia? I agree that Russia is not the nation we would want it to be right now, but it’s hard to argue they are 100% bad when they’ve been fighting nato the last two years. Not to mention objectively speaking Putin has been dealing with the Russian oligarchs his entire career that were created by the west. It’s only since the war in Ukraine that Russia has had any real hold of their economy since 1991. I think you need some historical perspective on this because you sound exactly the same as any western liberal.

                • CamillePagliacci [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  So you don’t like this move purely because of Russia?

                  I don’t know whether to support the move, I don’t like the optics of speaking of your warm relations with a fascist regime, and I think it is generally a mistake to trust a fascist regime with your security.

                  I think you need some historical perspective on this because you sound exactly the same as any western liberal.

                  Hey you know who said pretty much the same about Putin dealing with the oligarchs and not being so bad and actually their government is good and cool now? The obama state department before the Syrian civil war. I think the ones lacking historical perpective isn’t me., I think it’s you guys. And given the immutable fact that I am right (always) and that I’m not the one in agreement with the US state department back when it wanted to have good Russian relations, I’m pretty confident in saying so.

                  • YuccaMan [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    32
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Nobody’s telling you not to argue for your point of view here, but this “I’m always right” bit doesn’t make you sound confident, it makes you sound like a smug prick

                  • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Hey you know who said pretty much the same about Putin dealing with the oligarchs and not being so bad and actually their government is good and cool now?

                    I’m gonna need some proof on this because I’ve never seen or heard such a thing. Not to mention Putin was not able to fully deal with the Russian oligarchs (WHO HAD CONNECTIONS TO WESTERN POWERS) until the US sanctioned them.

                    And given the immutable fact that I am right (always)

                    Very cute.

          • davel [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m learning that this place will excuse anything

            Okay, I’ll copypasta myself again:

            Honest question from a non-communist, based on your reply here. Does one need to support Putin to be a Marxist?

            In a word, no. In a few more words, support for Russia (not Putin, as historical materialists don’t subscribe to great man theory) is only a partial, temporary, tactical one, in the context of imperialist liberation. Russia is still a capitalist state, though, so it’s a two stage strategy: first liberate colonized bourgeois states from colonizer states, and second revolution within those liberated bourgeois states.

            Russia is an interesting case: it has already liberated itself from the post-Soviet “shock therapy” neocolonizers. This occurred during Putin’s administration, which is why he is especially hated by the US. So now the support for Russia is in the context of keeping the colonizers from recolonizing it, and supporting Russia to the extent that it helps other states liberate themselves. But Russia isn’t trying to “liberate” Ukraine, at least not all of Ukraine. It’s trying to resolve the genocidal attacks on the people of the Donbas, and it’s trying to resolve the imperialist military expansion at its border.

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’m learning that this place will excuse anything, including the violent suppression of communist by fascist movements and the US state department, as long as they can own the libs on the internet.

            Ask me how I know you’re going to make a post that sums up to this in like two thousand words, with shittily-cited quotations and at least one outright plagiarization, to either lemm.ee, sh.itjust.works, or lemmy.world the minute you eventually catch your ban from this fed.

            • davel [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They really did go from five month squeaky-clean modlog to permaban in one thread. huh What a speedrun that was.

              • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I’d like to hope it’s just like. Some unmedicated ish, and that they’ll come back copacetic on a new account, 'cause I was here to see it and don’t really get how that’s possible, like-- liberals aren’t typically that patient about dropping a mask; and that whole bullshit could’ve been avoided if they’d just shut the fuck up, accepted the critique for bearing western water, and actually stopped to think about the asinine fuckshit they were saying.