The streaming sites listed on https://rentry.co/megathread-movies-and-tv#streaming have plenty of duplicates. Essentially, they’re the same sites with different names/skins but the exact same content.

It would be beneficial to the community if we could consolidate these down into groups according to which ones are the same.

We can still list all of them, but perhaps do it together so people don’t waste their time trying out the same site under a different name.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It would also be beneficial to the copyright enforcement, as they could just take it all down in one move.

  • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    As the other person sarcastically implied, these sites are intentionally split to make it more difficult to take them all down at once. When one goes down another can pop up, and in the mean time the others are there, on and on forever.

    • john89@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So are you saying we shouldn’t group them together?

      Do you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down?

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I feel like this is attempt of an “akswually” moment.

        No. We don’t know about copyright law (and I’m sure you don’t either) but based on previous precedent, it’s not wise to put a everything in one since if something “happens” there will be no alternatives since…the sole source will be gone due to everything being grouped into the sole source.

        • john89@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          it’s not wise to put a everything in one since if something “happens” there will be no alternatives since…the sole source will be gone due to everything being grouped into the sole source.

          Umm, what? It’s just a list grouping them together.

          How are they going to identify the ‘sole source’ out of that?

          I don’t think you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down.

          • GiveMemes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You clearly know zero abt copyright law if you think law enforcement is legitimately getting involved. 9.99999999 times out 10 it’s a letter from a lawyer.

            • john89@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              So how does an online list grouping them together make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down? For reference, there is already a list of free streaming sites; it’s the list in question. I’m merely mentioning adding further classification for duplicate streaming sites.

              It’s sad watching the upvote ratios, but I can’t say I’m surprised. The internet is full of 🧩’s.

              • 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Way to go, turning a legitimate question with legitimate answers into an opportunity to insult an unrelated group of people 👍🏽

        • john89@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Grouping them together in a list will not affect those logistics.

          • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re already grouped together in a list that you already linked in the original post

            • john89@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              So what’s the problem with adding another group for duplicates?