Clinton absolutely doesn’t care about people with wombs, all she cares about is herself, power, money, and a place in the history books, and I can’t see any way in which overturning RvW would be her desired legacy. Nothing about it makes any sense.
And just a gentle reminder that trans men can also be affected by this situation, so it’s worth an effort to use trans inclusive language.
Is that why she picked an anti abortion running mate in 2016? Because she cares about women?
Clinton absolutely doesn’t care about people with wombs, all she cares about is herself, power, money, and a place in the history books, and I can’t see any way in which overturning RvW would be her desired legacy. Nothing about it makes any sense.
And just a gentle reminder that trans men can also be affected by this situation, so it’s worth an effort to use trans inclusive language.