Instagram is profiting from several ads that invite people to create nonconsensual nude images with AI image generation apps, once again showing that some of the most harmful applications of AI tools are not hidden on the dark corners of the internet, but are actively promoted to users by social media companies unable or unwilling to enforce their policies about who can buy ads on their platforms.

While parent company Meta’s Ad Library, which archives ads on its platforms, who paid for them, and where and when they were posted, shows that the company has taken down several of these ads previously, many ads that explicitly invited users to create nudes and some ad buyers were up until I reached out to Meta for comment. Some of these ads were for the best known nonconsensual “undress” or “nudify” services on the internet.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a transitional period issue. In a couple of years you can just say AI made it even if it’s a real picture and everyone will believe you. Fake nudes are in no way a new thing anyway. I used to make dozens of these by request back in my edgy 4chan times 15 years ago.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a transitional period issue. In a couple of years you can just say AI made it even if it’s a real picture and everyone will believe you.

      Sure, but the question of whether they harm the victim is still real… if your prospective employer finds tons of pics of you with nazi flags, guns and drugs… they may just “play it safe” and pass on you… no matter how much you claim (or even the employer might think) they are fakes

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Dead internet.

      It also means in a few years, any terrible thing someone does will just be excused as a “deep fake” if you have the resources and any terrible thing someone wants to pin on you with be cooked up in seconds. People wont just blanket believe or disbelieve any possible deep fake. They’ll cherry pick what to believe based on their preexisting world view and how confident the story telling comes across.

      As far as your old edits go, if they’re anything like the ones I saw, they were terrible and not believable at all.

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m still on the google prompt bandwagon of typing this query:

        stuff i am searching for before:2023… or ideally, even before COVID19, if you want more valuable, less tainted results. It’s only going to get worse from here, 2024 is the year of saturation with garbage data on the web (yes I know it was already bad before, but now AI is pumping this shit out at an industrial scale.)

      • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        People do that now, even without the excuses of ai deepfakes. They simply ignore the stuff that doesn’t fit their worldview, only focusing on what does.

        Ai stuff may make that easier, but it certainly won’t be some new problem.