const_void@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoFreeBSD can now boot in 25 millisecondswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1410arrow-down114 cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1396arrow-down1external-linkFreeBSD can now boot in 25 millisecondswww.theregister.comconst_void@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square85fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squareOn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year ago BSD overtake Linux or Windows in some areas Any examples? besides the well known security, lower footprint and simplicity. genuinely curious.
minus-squares_s@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoZFS? pf? The tooling is just superior in some cases.
minus-squareLufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agozfs is available on Linux just fine
minus-squareDoubletwist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYes, finally . But only after being available in FreeBSD for years.
minus-squareLufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSure, but as a reason for why BSD is better, the present is what’s important. I’m not downplaying it tho
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI know the points you mentioned but I don’t really follow much about BSD, but I have respect for it and knows it’s there the day I need it.
Any examples? besides the well known security, lower footprint and simplicity. genuinely curious.
ZFS? pf?
The tooling is just superior in some cases.
zfs is available on Linux just fine
Yes, finally . But only after being available in FreeBSD for years.
Sure, but as a reason for why BSD is better, the present is what’s important.
I’m not downplaying it tho
25ms boot time?
I know the points you mentioned but I don’t really follow much about BSD, but I have respect for it and knows it’s there the day I need it.