• MysticDaedra@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not retaliatory unless Israel has (recently) attacked Iran, which they haven’t. It should be considered revenge, not retaliation.

    Presumably Israel will respond in force. I’d hate to be living in Tehran right now.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      unless Israel has (recently) attacked Iran

      Um, did you not see the part where they blew up a fucking Iranian consulate in Syria is which Iranian sovereign soil?!

      If you don’t consider that an attack, what would your thought be if someone attacked a US or Russian consulate in another country.

      • Miaou
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Considering what the US did after Iran stormed their embassy in Tehran, this is all very ironic, but in the sad way

    • young_broccoli@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Didn’t Israel attacked Iran’s embassy in siria like 2 weeks ago?

      It should be considered revenge, not retaliation.

      Those are synonyms.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Isn’t attacking an embassy effectively the same thing as attacking directly on that country’s soil?

    • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tehran will be fine, but all of the power plants and other critical resources? if Israel can stuxnet the uranium enrichment system how difficult is it to take out basic infrastructure?