Pluralistic: Too big to care (04 Apr 2024) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.net

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14100831

"No, seriously. All those things Google couldn’t find anymore? Top of the search pile. Queries that generated pages of spam in Google results? Fucking pristine on Kagi – the right answers, over and ov

  • Bogasse@lemmy.mlEnglish
    13·
    9 months ago

    And it’s not only about user data, it would also expose the website to content spoofing in public wifi, which would for example allow the attacker to inject fishing content in the website.

    SSL encrypts the data you’re sending but it also ensures that you’re communicating only with who you think you are. Without SSL you can’t be confident about any of that.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      9 months ago

      If a website has literally no login system, there’s nothing to phish.

      There is honestly no reason to use SSL on a static website that has no login system and just displays some content.

      IE a static blog or etc, where the only content on the website is just “look at this stuff, okay thank you!”

      • Bogasse@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        That’s still my point, for example you could inject your own login system “create an account to keep track of your favorite artists, or some new shiny feature”. For there you can get people’s personal information, potentially a password they use on other services.

        An URL is something the general public will trust, if the content can be messed with you repurpose the website’s reputation. I took phishing as an example but even my not-so-creative and non-expert brain can think of other things : asking for donations, propaganda, advertising, censorship, …