• dinckelman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that some of you are putting the blame on instance owners/moderators is just showing that you have about the same amount of brain rot as the people actually posting this vile trash

    • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OK, I am going to take a minute away from the shit stirring and potentially provide some insight speaking as an admin who’s had the misfortune of dealing with this so I can maybe shift this comment section into an actually meaningful discussion.

      You can have your own opinion and feelings against lemmy.world but, this?

      The only thing that could have prevented this is better moderation tools. And while a lot of the instance admins have been asking for this, it doesn’t seem to be on the developers roadmap for the time being. There are just two full-time developers on this project and they seem to have other priorities. No offense to them but it doesn’t inspire much faith for the future of Lemmy.

      This is correct. Most lemmy admins likely agree as well, I don’t speak for anyone but myself but I can say that I think it would be hard to find someone who disagreed. What happened today is a result of a catastrophic failure on lemmys end, with issues that should have been addressed over a month ago just being completely ignored. The lemmy devs shared a roadmap during their AMA & they essentially were more concerned with making shit go faster… that’s about it.

      • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, honest question. What mod tools are lacking. If there’s something needed, what is that thing or things?

        I went over to the feature request page for Lemmy and I couldn’t find anything massive in terms of requests for moderation tools that would have been sure fire ways to stop this particular event.

        That said, there is over 400 open feature requests alone on Lemmy’s github. I obviously couldn’t go through every single one. But coming from the kbin side I’m just curious about our Lemmy brothers and sisters. It sounds dire and I’m woefully under informed on how bad it is.

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          There aren’t enough roles. There’s admin, moderator, and user, but it would be best to have tiers of user in between. Reports go to 4 categories of user when you file a report. Report a comment for violating a fun rule your community decided to implement (all post titles must contain “Jon Bois Rules!”)? That report goes to: the community moderators (good), the community’s host instance’s admin (bad), your instance’s admin (bad), the user who posted the “offending post”'s instance’s admin (bad).

          Only admins can permanently remove illegal content. If a mod “removes” it, it still sits visible to all in modlog, and for the purposes of CSAM specifically, that counts as distribution which is prosecuted as a worse crime than possession. Federation with other instances is effectively binary. You can or cannot federate, you cannot set traffic as unidirectional like you can on most other fediverse platforms. The modlogs make it hard to parse who the moderator performing an action is acting on the behalf of. Was it a community mod? An admin? Your admin?

          There’s more but my phone is getting low on battery

        • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, I don’t know what AutoMod did on Reddit but if what mods need is a rule-configurable post remover then I’d be happy to clobber together something in Python

      • stevecrox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As an admin, how do kbin moderation tools compare?

        Also does lemmy.world have the spare cash to offer cash for features?

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know this for sure, but I have a feeling that a hard fork is in Lemmy’s future. I don’t want to get super into it, but programming is a form of communication. What features you bake into a platform are reflective of the messages you want to propogate on that platform. Lemmy’s devs vision for what the platform should be might not be reflective of what most of us might think it should be. The moderation tools might not be a focus for a while, even if most of us view that as the greatest need

      • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was worded a harshly but I’m happy to see you jump in here @gabe@literature.cafe <3

        To users this might seem like it came out of the blue but instance admins know this is has been a big issue for months. The “roadmap” they shared was indeed, optimize the database queries to make things go brrrr, get more funding and update join-lemmy.org

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          100%, ultimately there might be disagreements amongst admins over many things but this is something that there is clear unity on and I felt important to establish it. Hell, I’ve disagreed with lemmy.world’s decisions on numerous fronts as well which you already know. I think the harshness is understandable as well, given you know

        • sunaurus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Forking solves the problem of inactive maintainers, or the problem of maintainers who don’t review and/or accept PRs, but Lemmy really doesn’t have either of these problems at the moment.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          With all forks of maintained projects it starts with saying several times “No, but seriously, you need to do something about this”

          Forks are the enemy of open source. The goal is merges. When someone forks a project without plans to merge back, it’s a sign that the project has failed them in some way

        • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a shame it’s not written in a PHP framework or something that’s more common. Plenty of devs have been helping about contributing to kbin development, it sounds like it’s a lack of manpower on Lemmy’s end that’s contributing to this

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, Rust was a good technical choice but in practice it really narrows down the pool of potential volunteers

            • stevecrox@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was an incredibly poor technical choice.

              Programming goes through fads where people will claim X can solve every problem. Eventually people realise a languages strengths/weaknesses and communities form.

              Rust is the current fad language, its developed a strong following in C/C++ communities but they have nothing to do with middleware (the role Lemmy is using Rust).

              It means lemmy devs will have to build everything themselves (instead of focussing on lemmy) and the pool of contributor’s will remain small.

              • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Rust is a great and fabulous language, but flexible it is not. If I were starting a Lemmy or Kbin type project from scratch I’d likely start with Python, TypeScript, Lua, or Go depending on what specifically I was worried about bogging me down in the future. And then later on if there were really heavy procedures or db calls that couldn’t be simplified anyway else, do those in rust. I think Rust has some very interesting features for micro service development, but for a monolith like Lemmy, it’s surely a nightmare

                • stevecrox@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  See my goto is Java/Spring Boot or Typescript/TSOA.

                  I avoid Python because Setuptools/Twine/FastAPI/\ docs conflict and seems to change so creating a good practice project layout is a huge time sink and none of the Python devs I meet seem to understand it.

                  I am doing GoLang atm, its ok but dev adoption is low where I am and no one has shown me a killer library/framework and being controlled by Google I am waiting for them to get bored and kill it.

                  Spring Boot takes longer to get going than TSOA/Express but hibernate makes SQL interactions trivial. I love typescript but types makes complex NoSQL queries far more convoluted than Java equivalents (its because Types can’t inherit and client libraries don’t use interfaces). So TSOA rocks in cases of speed or simplicity.

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is, there are currently discussions of attempting to do so but the issue lies that Rust is not only a really new programming language that really never was well suited for an application like this, forking means nothing if no one is going to contribute to the fork in the first place. I know that pawb.social is working on a fork iirc

      • McGriffTheCrimeDog@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Got a link to this AMA? Couldn’t find it.

        I agree with @Cube6392@beehaw.org, if modtools (one of the reasons for Reddit API protests in the first place) aren’t being prioritized, a hard fork of Lemmy will be inevitable. I know the Lemmy devs are known for being strangely hardheaded about certain issues.

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have shifted gears recently and been pretty receptive to this major critique. Things are going in a much better direction now that 2 months have passed. If I can find the AMA I will link you.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks like some CSAM fuzzy hashing would go a long way to catch someone trying to submit that kind of content if each uploaded image is scanned.

    https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-csam-scanning-tool/

    Not saying to go with CloudFlare (just showing how the detection works overall), but some kind of builtin detection system coded into Lemmy that grabs an updated hash table periodically

    • wagesj45@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not a bad idea, but I was working on a project once that would support user uploaded images and looked into PhotoDNA, but it was an incredible pain in the ass to get access to. I’m surprised that someone hasn’t realized that this should just be free and available. Kind of gross that it is put behind an application/paywall, imo. They’re just hashes and a library to generate the hashes. Why shouldn’t that just be open source and available through the NCMEC?

  • ninjirate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there not some way to involve the authorities? I feel like FBI/CIA or other foreign agencies would love to track down whoever is distributing. Like set up some sort of honeypot instance to catch them

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a bit confused, how does locking down a single community help?

    Are the spammers really just focusing on one community instead of switching to the next after it gets banned?

    I do hope there is an IP ban option, so someone can’t just use the same IP again to create an account on another instance and post CSAM from there. Obviously I do know about VPNs, but it makes it a tiny bit more difficult to spam in large amounts.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people don’t have static IP addresses, so banning their IP will only stop them temporarily. Then whoever gets that dynamic IP address next will be banned too. Then there’s CGNAT where 1 IP address can have up to 128 people using it at once and the address changes even more frequently.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re talking about temporary bans here, which do work against spam. Private users do have dynamic IPs, but at home I think I’ve had the same IP for years. They don’t wildly switch them around.

        On second thought the IP is probably not federated though, so if there isn’t a common IP block list which instances subscribe to it won’t work.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every time my router restarts I get a fresh wan IP. I can also manually grab a new one via the DHCP release/renew functions in it’s config page.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Weird, are you 100% sure? I can restart my router all day, my ISP gives me the same IP back pretty much every time.

            Probably depends on the ISP.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it that hard to not be completely retarded and innapropriate on the internet for these people? Only “viable” alternative to reddit and they have to fuck it up

    • ahornsirup@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d assume that fucking it up is the goal. Some people are just irredeemable sociopaths who get satisfaction out of ruining other people’s days.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I think its just some disgruntled online user who doesn’t like when people are happy rather than some corpo entity. I’ve seen some people saying Reddit did this. I’m more likely to believe a user of a widely defederated instance that’s shutting down because everyone defederated them is responsible, or a zealous fediverse user that refuses to touch Lemmy because of who the devs are and thinks theyre doing the world a favor by keeping anyone else from enjoying it

  • freamon@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One solution, perhaps, is if Lemmy users were better able to overcome the inertia of moving Communities, Instances, accounts, etc. Essentially to be a moving target for anyone who might want to cause harm. DDoSing lemmy.world? Okay, but we’re all on lemmy2.world now. Spamming a Community? Oh, you mean that one we all left?

    I’m not criticizing others, because I’m as guilty of it any anyone, but it might be better if we realized that our usernames are meaningless, there’s no Karma, our comment histories are full of ephemeral observations with only a very specific relevance. It wouldn’t really matter if - worst case scenario - everything was deleted. I realise this wouldn’t sound acceptable to new users, but since many of us on instances run by one person as a hobby, that might happen anyway.

    (As I was typing this, someone just replied to a 17 days old comment I made, so maybe this is all rubbish)

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, good to see you as usual.

      The issue here is more than illegal content gets propagated to every instance, so moving around doesn’t help that much in that regard, the issue would remain.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he’s asking why it is instances don’t ban self-hosting images and have posters use imgur and the like to post any kind of image, to prevent the proliferation of CP to begin with. Because presumably imgur and the like already have filters and mod armies checking uploads.

        • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          His comment literally accounts for a scenario of if child porn does get on imgur. His intent was to avoid accountability to lemmy, not avoid proliferation of CSAM. Which was what my question was trying to highlight

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            🤔 Hmm. Okay, I’m lost for an explanation then.

            There are actual child rape apologists making their way onto Lemmy, aren’t there? Maybe that’s what he’s doing. Getting his foot in the door to defend obscene shit

            • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              He’s looking to minimise risk to the Lemmy host not advocating for defending shit. Seriously how did you come to this conclusion?

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I was talking in general. I have noticed on .world’s news feed that there was an inundation of apologists specifically in the threads talking about the most blatantly heinous of crimes. There were people demanding empathy for the perpetrators, then speaking in generalities to subtly imply punishment itself is an inherently bad or unhelpful thing and that the perps in each thread should be given leniency.

                I even noticed it in a meme thread I made talking specifically about rape apologia. Same argumentation style, same M.O., and others in my own thread thought it was sus.

                Then I saw people using that same argumentation style to the letter to defend possession of CP last night.

                The pattern is clear – evil is upon us, and we need to pressure mods and instances of admins to not allow people to defend serious criminals anymore, because that is what it leads to.

            • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have a feeling his comment was more of a “not our problem” kind of thing, as opposed to defending CP. It’s not uncommon for people to want to do the minimum if it’s impacting something they like, possibly such as the sub that got closed. So I was trying to force some empathy into the conversation lol

  • ineedaunion @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shit posting needs to die anyway. Only thing that should be allowed on the internet is knowledge and education. Throw out the corporations too.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How will you enforce this new “no unapproved fun” policy? I think “Only knowledge and education” is a dangerous precedent to set, and we should strive for freedom of expression. And I mean real freedom of expression, not the “mandatory audience” version of freedom of expression the freeze peach folks want, I mean actual honest to goodness freedom of expression with freedom of association, including “We no longer wish to associate with you.”

      Part of that is that we all must be respectful of the bodily and personal autonomy of all people, which requires moderation of content that does not respect bodily and personal autonomy.

      In conclusion:

      • shitposting, fine
      • CSAM, deplorable
    • 8ace40@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds very extreme. I like humor, but not the trolling type. In my time we used to say “don’t feed the trolls”. When ignored they mostly go away. Nowadays there’s always someone arguing with them. It’s so stupid…

      • ineedaunion @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is education trolling? You do know the internet was made for communication and education until corporations took it over?

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humor = education? Trouble reading much?

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing that could have prevented this is better moderation tools. And while a lot of the instance admins have been asking for this, it doesn’t seem to be on the developers roadmap for the time being. There are just two full-time developers on this project and they seem to have other priorities. No offense to them but it doesn’t inspire much faith for the future of Lemmy.

    God, lemmy.world admins are something else

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, they are being paid now. They receive an immense amount of donations now, enough to likely make a solid monthly income. Take a look at their liberapay page if you don’t believe me. I understand that to a degree, but it only goes so far. When they are actively ignoring safety features despite its urgency in spite of that fact is difficult to justify.

          • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Take a look at their liberapay page if you don’t believe me.

            I took a look. “Lemmy receives US$392.03 per week from 287 patrons.”

            enough to likely make a solid monthly income.

            Approximately $850 per month each. Is that a solid income? Lots of developers are making $850 per day!

            When they are actively ignoring safety features

            The license agreement clearly places this onus on the instance operators. If they cannot commit to those terms, why did they accept the agreement? It is not like someone holds a gun to your back and forces you to start a Lemmy instance.

            • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry for not being more focused on being nicer to the devs of lemmy after problems that were discussed nearly a month ago being ignored have caused me and other instance admins to have to deal with the stress of dealing with CSAM federating into our instances and having to witness that content in order to remove it.

              That is sarcasm by the way. In comparison to how I actually feel currently, I could be a lot more indignant about this but I am fighting that urge as it is not productive.

              • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Nothing cares whether you present yourself as being nice or not. Information has no feelings.

                But the Lemmy devs clearly pushed that responsibility downstream under the contractual terms of using the software. Maybe that made the agreement a bad deal, but nobody else had to ever agree to the bad terms. It seems you did agree to it. Why?

                What the contract also allowed, however, was the ability for you to modify the software as you see fit. That part is a good deal. It seems the solution is staring you right in the face. Since you’re already committed, why spend your typing here and not in your favourite code editor?

            • toasteecup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              850/day? That’s crack smoking money. Where do I sign up for this?!

              For the record that’s sarcasm and the comment is bullshit. The average salary for a developer in the USA is 140,000$, https://www.salary.com/research/salary/listing/senior-software-developer-salary

              The comment’s math would mean developers are making roughly 306,000/year. More than double the actual average.

              In fairness, 392.03 a week averages out to 18,817.44 which is also not in that range.

              • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The comment’s math would mean developers are making roughly 306,000/year.

                Yes, developers at places like Google are making that much. Not the average developer, but nobody said the average developer.

                • toasteecup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Correct no one did, you however said “lots of developers” even if you added up all of developers at the FAANG companies you still would not have an appreciable percentage of the developers in the US workforce let alone the world. So no. Not lots of developers. A very small few. Truthfully probably even fewer than that because not even Google wants to pay 300k per developer only to qualified/experienced developers.

                • toasteecup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I did 850 x 30 x 12 usual salary math. But I was also sleep deprived so perhaps not the best choice.

          • moreeni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blob/main/LICENSE

            The software provided as is. Period. They never agreed to be support boys for someone, and the amount of work doesn’t really correlate to the amount of money they get from donations unless they both live in a third world country.

            https://jacobtomlinson.dev/posts/2022/dont-be-that-open-source-user-dont-be-me/

            It’s just a matter of not being entitled, that’s it. All I’m asking for is so that people would be more polite to FOSS devs. If they stop doing their work right now what are you going to do? Implement the mod tools yourself? Then go ahead.

            • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry, but I have difficulty being polite to someone who has actively ignored addressing safety concerns that were brought up months ago. FOSS or not.

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Stop misconstruing it as safety. It’s about legality. Nobody’s safety is in jeopardy because they saw an illegal image accidentally. This is about following the law, not protecting the safety of users.

                • toasteecup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  nobody’s safety is in jeopardy

                  You know, except for those abuse victims whose pictures are being spread around lemmy. Just sayin’

                • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It ties into safety as well, websites have “trust and safety” teams. This is where it falls under. Sorry for not being more concise.

                • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “CSAM laws aren’t for the safety of real people” is one of the hottest takes I’ve ever seen in my life

      • moreeni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Lemmy is free and provided as is, nobody is obligated to do shit.

        It would have been different if they simply pointed this out, but they specifically aimed this at the two people doing a ton of work for free making it available for everyone. That’s simply rude and ungrateful, in my opinion.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah man, if you’re building an online platform made to share content there’s no excuse to lack at least basic moderation capabilities especially when it comes to this type of illegal and seriously fucked up content. It isn’t the early 00s, we know how important this shit is by now. If mod tools don’t make their way to the top of the dev’s backlog after this I don’t think I’m staying on Lemmy.

          • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think I’m staying on Lemmy.

            As bad as it sounds, I was thinking about it too. The risk of something similar happening again is just too high to be ignored.

            What I could imagine is a temporary hold on federation (to prevent the propagation of CSAM content), and instances organizing in small clusters of trust, waiting for sufficient tools, be it mod tools, CSAM scanning or whatever, so that there can be federation again.

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It would totally suck for self hosting, but yeah I don’t see a way around it at this point. Maybe allow federation on a selective basis?