So far there’s subscriptions for cruise control, adaptive beams, various navigation options, apple/google integration and my favorite, dual-zone climate.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    People like the option. It’s not weird at all to believe that having different options for owning, leading, and renting allows more access to the vehicle and products. The original comment is about limiting how I pay for a car. Leasing+ subscription works for many customers.

    • GiveMemes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      People like the option to have already installed equipment just not work if they don’t pay the subscription? Like the car already has the features and the company is saying “we included this equipment in the price of your lease/purchase already but if you’d like to use it you have to keep paying more.”

      Even in the case of a lease, this is just anti-consumer bullshit

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        With BMW and Toyota it was cheaper to sub for 3 years than purchase outright. Yes, that’s an attractive option.

        • GiveMemes
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not what I said. Good strawman/whataboutism combo, but try harder.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      A leased car with those options 5 years ago didn’t cost you a subscription, and now they will. You want the option to what? Pay more for something that you didn’t have to before?

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Again, on both the Toyota and BMW, it was less expensive than purchasing the options. You did pay for them before. They were never free.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Not true. Just think about what you’re saying for five seconds and you’ll realize how absurd it is. If you buy a BMW or a Toyota that has an available heated seat subscription for example, whether you pay for it or not, they installed the heated seats. it doesn’t cost BMW or Toyota a cent for you to use your heated seats, it costs them to install them. You really think that you haven’t already paid for those heated seats that they’ve already installed in the car? are you seriously suggesting that these companies are going to to sell you these cars with heated seats in them without charging you for them? That if you choose not to pay for the heated seats, they’re just going to eat that cost? Get real.

          • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It is far cheaper to produce a single trim with most of the features. Customization costs money. There is a reason Porsches are expensive.

            Multiple seat types is literally buildings and lines they need to construct. It’s a similar scales of economy concept like binning chips. Instead of multiple lines.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Even if that were true, that still means that everyone is paying for that one single trim, including all the optional features in it. By paying for the subscription, you’re just paying more money, not less.