• harderian729@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m curious what the legality of this really is.

    What rights do businesses have to dictate which restrooms their patrons use?

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Probably none. The whole bathroom debate has been legally dubious from the outset.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s weird. They can refuse people using their bathrooms if they don’t pay, I figured denying them for other reasons was also on the table.

          • harderian729@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean, they shouldn’t even have to check birth certificates.

            What’s stopping a business from saying you can’t use their restrooms just because they feel like it?

            • Djtecha@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              Might be part of the requirement for running a business is you have to have a restroom available. When’s the last time you were in a restaurant without a bathroom? I’m sure they all don’t just supply one because it’d be weird to not, instead it’s probably part of the license req.

            • neptune@dmv.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Well potentially nothing? Until someone says “why?” and then it becomes gender discrimination

            • quindraco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              In the general case, nothing. Not too long ago I was in a Ben & Jerry’s that had closed its bathroom down, for example.

              The bartender in question here committed battery; that’s the underlying crime, not denying bathroom access. The hate crime rider on top is, by definition, an enhanced penalty for thinking illegal thoughts while committing some other crime.