• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    A conservative could say the same thing with a different book.

    Stop trying to ban books.

    • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They will ban books regardless of whether harmful books are banned.

      Freedom of speech doesn’t extend to incitement of hatred. If it does, your laws don’t protect freedom of speech as much as they protect the freedom to call for, and eventually cause, genocide.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Free speech DOES extend to hatred, though.

        Did y’all forget the ACLU once defended the National Socialist Party of America’s right to free speech?

        If you expect your right to say “fuck the police” or wear a shirt emblazoned with the same, you can’t go around saying the law should keep someone from wearing a swastika. BOTH are protected by the right to free speech, as much as you and much of the left don’t want to admit it.

        I stand for the PRINCIPLE of free speech rather than wheeling it out to defend speech I like but then pretending like it doesn’t exist to suppress speech I don’t.

        In order to preempt some of the more predictable responses to this, no, private companies cannot violate your right to free speech - only the government can. So if the book company in the OP decides to stop selling some books, I would not consider it to be violating free speech. But I think the conversation has strayed from that specific instance at this point.