• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m referring to US doing strikes in Yemen, this is nothing new and this strategy showed no results over past 8 years. No reason to expect anything different going forward.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Right, you’re talking about who lasts longer? I thought you were talking about the no impact thing and was confused.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s both, Yemenis have shown that they’ve been able to last for 8 years without any clear impact from the bombing strategy. The impact from Yemeni blockade is visible, we see economic costs for the west. The impact from bombing in terms of Yemen being able to pursue its policies is not clear because we don’t see their policies change or become less effective.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So when you meant no impact you were thinking of in the way that if they can still shoot missiles that means there has been no impact?

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right, I’m saying the strikes are not achieving a change in behavior or capability. So, there is no impact in terms of what Yemen is doing whether US carries strikes out or not.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I guess I thought you meant the strikes were having no impact as in genuinely zero impact

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Missile firing infrastructure and capability is sorta the target. Luckily first civilian death was just yesterday and so far I think that’s the only one.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    If missile firing infrastructure is the target, then it’s pretty clear that US is not capable of doing any meaningful damage to this infrastructure. Again, the original point was that US is unable to achieve its stated goals while Yemen is.