• SoonaPaana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a very very cool graphic. Really highlights that MSG is needlessly antagonized. Also so weird to see sarin and nicotine next to each other.

    Marketing is a bitch.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Exactly. Gasoline, for example, is remarkably non-toxic, but it will cause instant chemical burns to your throat and lungs, possibly killing you far below the (chemically) lethal dose.

        Methanol will turn you blind at a quarter of the listed dose, and those two are just from the top of my head.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Or aspects like arsenic staying in your body a very long time, or the fact that LSD is psychoactive in microgram doses, so you’d need thousands of tabs to die.

      • neo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wonder how they came up with the LD50 of all those materials, like THC and LSD. Is this based on theoretical calculation, in vitro tests, or on a (assumably) very small sample of known deaths?

        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Step 1: Feed/Inject mutliple rat populations with different concentrations
          Step 2: See how many die.
          Step 3: The concentration which causes 50% of the population to die is the LD50

          • neo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            While I was thinking you were yet another user, you were a rat the whole time! Wait, we are all rats!

            Jokes aside, animal testing as a data source seems reasonable to me. Thanks