QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agoDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down10cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-29 months agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoDo you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoI guess that’s a yes lol
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoThis conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that’s a yes lol
This conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.