• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    How did they still have a team after 43 players got reds? Also, I’ve never heard of board members getting reds before.

    • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      If my math is right, each team had roughly an entire other team of players on the bench (10-11 players) and since this is a U-20 team, there’s a good chance they still have some fieldable players in their training pool. Mamore declared they don’t have enough left to field the minimum 11 for their next match though. As for red cards to board members, it’s not entirely out of the ruleset, as coaches can and have been expelled.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      How did they still have a team after 43 players got reds?

      They didn’t - the match was abandoned. And they didn’t even bother with the second leg of the tie, the team that was 3-1 down just agreed to forfeit 😁

  • Ilandar@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Based on that video I’d suggest lifetime bans would not be unwarranted for many involved.