• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    “We need new technologies that can be controlled by a megacorporation to make a select few rich, not things that individuals can do or use that can break the hold of existing monopolies”

      • monobot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Thanks for that thought, I was confused who is arguing so much for nuclear that is not solving anything and is too expensive.

        Shilling makes a lot of sense, but never came to me.

        And downvotes without explanation, even here. I guess normal people are also under influence.

      • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is nuclear a bad option? Only downsides I’ve heard are basically optics problems. Barring facilities that catastrophically failed on top of horrid safety policy negligence, they seem perfectly suited for baseline power production.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Cost. The reality is nuclear is not just more expensive than every other option, it’s a lot more. I remember seeing something like ten times the cost of solar, per whatever unit of energy