• smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ad hominem again. This is no way to have a constructive discussion. Please use arguments to support your position and don’t attack the opposition personally.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve already explained my argument to you repeatedly in multiple comments as have other people. Unfortunately, you’ve amply demonstrated lack of basic reading comprehension required to understand and respond to such arguments. Therefore there is no need to repeat these arguments. If you feel personally attacked when people point that out to you, that’s entirely your problem.

          • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re still just attacking me personally, rather than engaging in discussion with me and replying to my arguments with your own views and arguments.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              I tried engaging with you in discussion and quickly realized that it’s pointless. Your “arguments” have been repeatedly addressed by me as well as multiple other people. You just keep regurgitating the same talking points you’ve memorized like a broken record.

              • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I don’t think that’s true. You did not once address my argument that we should not produce more nuclear waste while we have no facility to store it in the long term in a safe manner.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I did address it repeatedly. Not having a facility is a choice, and Germany had many decades to figure out how to make one. It’s pretty clear that Germans would rather destroy our environment by burning coal than to actually get serious about moving from fossil fuels. Your actions speak for themselves.

                  • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Yes and there is no such facility. So we can’t store our nuclear waste. Germany also wants as I stated multiple times to phase out coal power by 2038. Germany has currently 52% renewables and aims to be climate neutral by 2045. The move away from fossil fuel has been decided in Germany years ago.