- cross-posted to:
- rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
- cross-posted to:
- rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/rpgmemes/p/1274956/how-it-probably-happened
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/rpgmemes/p/1274956/how-it-probably-happened
Pedant mode activated But the Pyramids are pyramids with a square base, and a tetrahedron is a special case of a pyramid with a triangular base.
The answer is obvious: the pyramids are the tips of half-buried D8s.
That makes it worse.
Yeah, if no side was facing up they’ll have to reroll.
It’s cocked
As a D5, I wonder if it would roll a lot of, or very few 1’s.
And if the answer was ‘a lot’ I wonder how many dice companies would make the peak a 5.
That’d be a weird die. Even if we’re not talking about balance issues, other than the peak, the 4 other things potentially on top would be not be faces or corners but edges.
Also, in D&D 5e (2014), you just roll a single d4, then add 1 and multiply it all by 3 (or multiply by higher than 3 if upcast), instead of rolling 3 dice: https://www.sageadvice.eu/magic-missile-do-you-roll-the-same-d4-for-all-darts/
I don’t know of anyone who actually does that at home tables, because 3d4+3 is statistically less likely to give the minimum (or maximum) damage than (1d4+1)*3.
I’m sorry but this is just wrong. From PHB 2014:
Each dart deals 1d4 + 1 damage and there are 3 darts, so 3d4 +3 damage.
Nope, here is RAW:
Magic Missile:
And “Damage Rolls,” PHB, 196:
I mean, they even provided a link to sage advice where Crawford answers that specific question.