• A Sharky Anthro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ugh, this company is totally fucking creepy! If only there were a way to disrupt these glasses using readily available electronics…

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s an Android app that will constantly scan for their Bluetooth signature in the background and alert you.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I just bought new glasses and got an IR-blocking lens coating that’s supposed to thwart facial recognition from things like these and Flock cameras and whatnot. It’s not active disruption via electronics, but it is a countermeasure…

      • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I thought IR only applies to night vision or low light modes, which not all cameras even use.

        most surveillance cameras, including the ones being discussed in Meta glasses, just use regular optical sensors for well illuminated environments.

        wouldn’t IR blocking be completely useless when theres no Infrared LEDs projecting at you?

      • A Sharky Anthro@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Countermeasures are good, despite them not being active…It’s important to disrupt these terrible techs whenever possible!