The court noted that the Commission had failed to take into account that private jets could be flown on sustainable fuel.
Ex-fucking-cuseme?
There is no sustainable fuel, at least not the type that won’t generate CO2, WHICH IS THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS.
Yeah you can grow biofuels, then you have the exact same fuel coming from a different source. Awesome. STILL GENERATES THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF CO2 YOU TWATS
STILL GENERATES THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF CO2 YOU TWATS
It only generates the same amount of CO2 that has been previosly (within a short period of time, e.g. a year) taken from the atmosphere.
The time constraint is the reason burning wood is not considered CO2-neutral.
Ex-fucking-cuseme?
There is no sustainable fuel, at least not the type that won’t generate CO2, WHICH IS THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS.
Yeah you can grow biofuels, then you have the exact same fuel coming from a different source. Awesome. STILL GENERATES THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF CO2 YOU TWATS
It only generates the same amount of CO2 that has been previosly (within a short period of time, e.g. a year) taken from the atmosphere.
The time constraint is the reason burning wood is not considered CO2-neutral.