

It’s not really any cheaper. The only way you can save money is by not buying anything but sticking with what you have already.


It’s not really any cheaper. The only way you can save money is by not buying anything but sticking with what you have already.


Not just the tech industry. A huge proportion of the US economy is made up of betting on AI. Like the crash of 2008 (but worse, some predict) it will hurt everyone but the richest, who will become even richer.


Meanwhile, manufacturers have less flexibility with budget notebooks. Lowering their specs would make the affordable options struggle with even basic tasks in Windows 11.
Linux would help. And keeping that old PC for as long as it still works. Microsoft didn’t see this coming with their attempt to force everyone onto new hardware. So much for their bloated, resource-guzzling “AI OS”. No one wants it and no one will have the money to run it.


Trump is seen as being strongly aligned with the working class
This explanation is even more unfathomable than the thing it explains. I dont really understand how anyone can look at the (multi)billionaire Trump and think “he’s on the side of the workers.”


They are paid to be so.


This bill did not pass because the Senate was evenly divided and the Democrats suffered a backbench rebellion from two “centrist” senators.
There’s a reasonable suspicion the Democrats only advance these bills proposing real change when they already know they have those two “rebels” lined up to block it. That way they keep the voters coming back for another try, while looking after the interests of those who pay them.


Ah but RFK knows fire kills measles, COVID and cancer.


In October, the group played an active role in advocating for the release of a 16-year-old Palestinian-American from Florida who had been held in an Israeli prison for eight months. Mohammed Ibrahim was released last month.
Oh, it’s that kind of terrorism - the sort where you stand up to protect the victims of Israel’s genocidal fascism. Makes sense now.


If there’s one thing I know about Americans it’s that when they say “bullshit” they mean “utter poppycock, twaddle and codswallop.”


Or when he thought Portland was a war zone because he saw it on Fox News?


If it discourages Trump from coming to London, I’m sure most Londoners would be fine with him staying deluded.


It will probably just be vague fearmongering, like “This product hasn’t been proven not to have the potential to do really bad things to you.”


They can’t be that incompetent
Have you seen these billionaires? They absolutely can. The myth of their competence is pure propaganda.
Also, they like corruption because it offers many opportunities for those with enough money to pay. And they like oppression of workers because it provides a ready pool of cheap labour to exploit.
They’ll be looking at Russia and liking what they see, because they don’t see themselves being the ones working for pennies and being sent to die in Ukraine. And they all think they’re the smartest guy in the world (“why else would I have so much money?”) so they don’t see themselves being fucked over by Putin either. For them Russia is the promise of doing whatever you want, taking advantage of whomever you want, and getting whatever you want.


In Chinese, affirmation is often compiled through negation:
没错 (méi cuò) = “not wrong” = Right
不差 (bù chà) = “not bad” = Decent
还行 (hái xíng) = “still passable” = Okay
没事 (méi shì) = “no problem” = It’s fine
In English, this feels bizarre. If something is good, you say:
Nice
Great
Perfect
Brilliant
You name the quality directly. You point at it. You own it.
In American positivity-laden, self-marketing, businessy English perhaps. But in the UK “not bad”, “could be worse”, “not wrong”, “can’t complain”, “I’ve had worse” and so on is often as positive as it gets, or at least was for a long time. American positive-speak gets on British people’s nerves; it’s perceived as boorish, boastful and unsubtle. And “no problem” is common in English all over. British people do say “brilliant” but only when they’re being unusually enthusiastic, or fake, or sarcastic.


This reads like it could be about either the USA or Russia.


What a coincidence that the MAGA USA’s policy towards Europe is almost indistinguishable from Russia’s!
The problem is that even if at some level they realize this, self-deceit and denial is an easier way to deal with the feeling that maybe their whole world view has been a bad mistake, than admitting their whole world view has been a bad mistake and changing it.
Is this named after Karl Popper? If so that’s unfortunate because Popper spent his life arguing against the validity of inductive reasoning in science. His distinctive contribution was to try to describe a scientific method that did not depend on induction.
https://philosophy.institute/logic/poppers-critique-rejection-induction/