• wagesj45@fedia.io
    101·
    9 days ago

    I wonder how these bans will hold up once people start having them as their only source of corrective lenses, or if they rely on an integrated accessibility service.

    • renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      231·
      9 days ago

      I think this needs to be solved at the legislative level, devices used to aid in a disability can’t simultaneously be invading the privacy of everyone around

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        72·
        9 days ago

        I smell a loophole.

        Or maybe Karen’s “therapy” pitbull just shit in the store again.

        Could be both.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      17·
      9 days ago

      I mean if I had a wheelchair with a camera attached so it, I expect people might not let me in certain places, and that’s kind of on me for buying that wheelchair

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        6·
        9 days ago

        and that’s kind of on me for buying that wheelchair

        Part of the issue is that there may be a critical mass having them. Core issue of our comm is that we care, but the market is apathetic.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        1·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, I’m getting a gopro attached to my hybrid etrike/scooter/wheelchair dealie when I can afford it. I can’t afford it if I can’t afford a very visible lens cover (a little C of plastic costs how much?).

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      9·
      9 days ago

      Could be treated similarly to how disabled parking is–you are required to also have a card from the DMV/DOL/whatever your state calls it on you when using a disabled parking spot. You need to be able to display this if asked by the police/parking enforcement, not that it ever really comes up.

      Give out a card like that or like a medical marijuana card for people who use them as assistive devices.