Supermarket responds after Reddit user’s warning about self-checkout overcharge — ‘Was annoyed that the total amount due on my supermarket purchase did not equate to the individual items I purchased.’::‘Was annoyed that the amount due on my Woolies purchase did not equate to the individual items I purchased.’

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    “We’ve looked into this transaction and can confirm that the total of $17.90 was correct, however the mango price of 80 cents each that appeared on the screen was incorrect due to a technical error — they were on clearance for $1.90 each,” the Woolworths spokesperson told 7NEWS.com.au.

    “We understand why this customer was concerned and we apologise for the confusion caused. Our team resolved this with the customer in-store, providing the mangoes free of charge.

    Seems pretty straightforward and had a good resolution.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      11 months ago

      But, what kind of software do they have that uses one price source for the unit pricing display and another source for calculating the total? It seems that it is destined to create more problems like this one.

      • Enk1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        POS software is right up there with vehicle infotainment systems when it comes to reliability and usability. They get the dregs of the programming world because decent coders have a way better selection of companies to work for.

        • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Even when they get decent coders for the base code, feature creep eventually wrecks the system. I know someone who helped write the POS system used in Disney parks, and according to them the system they originally built didn’t suck nearly as much as the system I used as a cast member, and it’s the hastily tacked on bullshit (causing the initial competent team to quit) that ultimately broke it. That said, I do realize that most people will not admit to shipping shoddy code in the first place.

          • Enk1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Unless you’re talking about Android Auto or CarPlay, I’d have to disagree. Even in high end luxury cars the OEM infotainment systems are a joke.

            And before someone chimes in and says “But Tesla,” please understand that a clean and stylish user interface does not make for a good user experience. Tesla put simple but important functions behind an interface that often requires multiple clicks to find what, in any other car, is a single button, knob, or stalk away. Buttons and knobs make for a better user experience and safer driving because they don’t require you to take your eyes off the road to navigate a menu.

      • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I imagine there’s code to do something like currency conversion or maybe rewards points calculation so the displayed amount is not actually the number used for the final total

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Seems pretty straightforward and had a good resolution.

      Well, except for when the Redditor went home and spread lies technically factual statements presented in a misleading manner and omitting key details with the apparent goal of damaging the reputation of the store despite being treated with kindness and fairness by the manager.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lies? What lies? They went home and said “I found this situation annoying.” How is that a lie?…

  • cjf@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve come to realise at least half of the stuff posted on Reddit these days, especially more so on the popular subs, are all designed to make you angry.

    It’s things like posting incorrect info in the title, posting a comic / image that’s been deliberately designed to get you angry, someone really wanting their 5 minutes of fame like this guy, or some post from some bigot.

    It’s so tiring. Have started to notice it on Lemmy too.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ragebait had become the new tactic to generate engagement for a while now.

      Hopefully people will soon catch on and become fed up with it because I am sure this tactic has been one of the biggest contributing factors in polarizing people against each other and making politics so toxic.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Facebook has started to do that and… it’s fucking annoying that it works. Lots of bullshit demonising trans people pushed to me 10+ times a day.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      The news aggregator communities tend to post the clickbait titles verbatim because it’s generally frowned upon to editorialize them. However a few users do put a proper heading or a short summary in the post body which I appreciate.

      We have our share of drama llamas here as you know, but we also have pictures of !crows@lemmy.ml, !cat@lemmy.world, !superbowl@lemmy.world.

      If you follow !toronto@lemmy.ca and !vancouver@lemmy.ca you will see my picture posts of various cityscapes.

      Lastly, beehaw.org is a bit closed off from some instances but their server is a bit more chill outside of their politics community.

  • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    What a garbage article. I assume this is a bit reporting, otherwise please don’t post crap like this from bad news sources.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is just how it works in the US and Canada, though.

    $1.50 scanned.

    Your total is $1.65.

    Would you like to make a donation to a children’s charity?

    • $1
    • $2
    • $5
    • (other)

    Please select a tip percentage:

    • 18%
    • 20%
    • 25%
    • 100%
    • (other)
  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Tempest in a teapot.

    Did they call someone over when they saw the discrepancy? Because, you know, mistakes happen.

    I frequently have something not scan, or not come up right. There’s a button for help, there’s always someone right there anyway, hell, had a clerk walk up and help when he noticed I hit the wrong button. They pay attention.

    “I was annoyed”… That a system misreported something? If I was annoyed every time that happened I’d never not be annoyed.

    What’s with this sudden “self checkout rage bait” this week? Who’s pushing what agenda?

      • arctickako@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or it might be that Coles and Woolies are already under investigation for price gouging all while unsurprisingly posting record profits. Most Australians have felt the really quick rise of the cost of living, and are rightly skeptical of both supermarkets which basically hold a duopoly over Australian shops. They already do a bunch of sketchy shit, what’s to stop them from doing more?

          • arctickako@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Aight bud, that was to show why there’s already distrust towards both corporations. It’s not hard to see why people would be inclined to believe that Coles/Woolies are trying to fuck them over yet again.

      • Slovene@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        There’s a lot of "I deserve to have a human scan items” takes that are bafflingly stupid.

        I know, right? People should be glad that prices are rising while wages are stagnating and now having to do additional work to reduce cost and increase profits for corporations.

        I also don’t get the entitled assholes in restaurants. You wan’t to be waited on? Just go up to the cook directly yourself and tell them what you want to eat. And then bring it to your table that you’ve cleaned up yourself. In fact, restaurants should get rid of cooks as well. Just go to the restaurant and cook your own meal, you lazy bastards!

          • Slovene@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m a fan of stores hiring even more cashiers and them working fewer hours (without a paycut, ofcourse; sonething like 4 day workweek) to spread out the workload and having more people employed and reducing the long lines.

            I am a fan of not replacing all the cashiers with selfcheckouts.

            I am a fan of putting mechanisms in place that reduce the incidence of RSI. Not to mention the fact that there are occupations with a high incidence of much much harsher illnesses and injuries etc.

            I am a fan of people having more free time after they get off work instead of having to spend it waiting in line for someone to finally check their items out and then having to spend a long time doing it themselves.

            And I never said it was to hurt corporations but that your comment sounded like bootlicking. But, yeah, I want cashiers because everyone only goes to the store for a single item. Nice strawman you got there.

              • Slovene@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                You do realize that the elderly and disabled people go shopping too, right?

                How is your point being proven? Also, read my comment again, I edited some stuff. Might edit it some more later, IDK. I mean, your only argument seems to be “high incidence of RSI and people are lazy hurr durr.”

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Did they call someone over when they saw the discrepancy? Because, you know, mistakes happen.

      Not in software. The software is doing exactly what it was programmed to do.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Ignoring the price discount on the mangos, the answer here is sales tax, right? Because otherwise it would be $15.70. It’s a bad design that tax amounts don’t show up on the itemized screen (but probably on the final screen after that).

    Tell me if anyone knows for sure, otherwise I’m going to assume that’s the issue…

    EDIT: Thank you folks, asked and answered! Then, I’m back to being very confused…

  • Oaksey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The last 4 scanned items listed on screen but “5” items scanned. I’d dare say the fifth items that isn’t shown on screen accounts for the difference?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      According to the article the mangos were on sale for a higher price than what showed up on the screen, it totaled them correct but there was a mistake with it saying .80 cents per mango. They gave them the mangos for free apparently and apologized. Same thing would have happened whether or not it was a self checkout or a person, the item was entered incorrectly into the system.

      Always verify what you are buying.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Got to give it to the Somali Pirates… That’s some next level marketing:

    “This appears to be an isolated incident at our MacArthur Metro store, involving the clearance price of a batch of our Calypso Mangoes.”