I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A charismatic wanabe tyrant will be frustrated every step they take towards getting more power.

    To be fair, this goes for everyone, not just a tyrant.