• @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah the headline makes you think it’s even within “normal” temperatures, and then you see that it’s like 10°C below above Absolute Zero.

            • CheezyWeezle
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -56 months ago

              Even if it was somehow 10° below absolute zero, it would still be 10° above absolute zero

              • @GiveMemes
                link
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I thought negative Kelvin were sometimes used to describe very very high temperatures but I could be wrong.

                Thanks for the downvotes y’all, enjoy being wrong:

                " Negative absolute temperatures (or negative Kelvin temperatures) are hotter than all positive temperatures - even hotter than infinite temperature."

                • CheezyWeezle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  Lmao I was kind of making a joke there, it’s an absolute scale so a negative number can’t actually exist, i.e. |-10| = 10

                  Additionally, temperatures expressed as negative Kelvin aren’t actually negative Kelvin in reality (“reality” meaning the actual physical existence in our material world) because, as you pointed out, the material would actually be more temperate. Negative Kelvin is useful to represent systems where adding energy decreases the entropy of the system, rather than the standard of increasing entropy, but to relate it to the actual heat or energy of the material gets murky.

    • Naich
      link
      fedilink
      246 months ago

      Loads of things superconduct below 10K - aluminium for one. This is for a different type of superconductor that can be turned on and off with a magnetic field.

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Not quite in the usable temp for engineering yet but definitely on the right path. And a wee bit less sketchy than the last one. That combine with the progress is fusion reactors. We have a bright future in energy ahead of us (but pretty grim everywhere else)

  • LostXOR
    link
    fedilink
    266 months ago

    Very cool, I didn’t know a toggleable superconductor was even possible. With all this research into superconductivity it’s only a matter of time before a room-temperature superconductor is found.