• pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeah the headline makes you think it’s even within “normal” temperatures, and then you see that it’s like 10°C below above Absolute Zero.

            • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              Even if it was somehow 10° below absolute zero, it would still be 10° above absolute zero

              • GiveMemes
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I thought negative Kelvin were sometimes used to describe very very high temperatures but I could be wrong.

                Thanks for the downvotes y’all, enjoy being wrong:

                " Negative absolute temperatures (or negative Kelvin temperatures) are hotter than all positive temperatures - even hotter than infinite temperature."

                • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Lmao I was kind of making a joke there, it’s an absolute scale so a negative number can’t actually exist, i.e. |-10| = 10

                  Additionally, temperatures expressed as negative Kelvin aren’t actually negative Kelvin in reality (“reality” meaning the actual physical existence in our material world) because, as you pointed out, the material would actually be more temperate. Negative Kelvin is useful to represent systems where adding energy decreases the entropy of the system, rather than the standard of increasing entropy, but to relate it to the actual heat or energy of the material gets murky.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    superconducting below 10K or -263C. a record but by no means room temperature.

    • Naich@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Loads of things superconduct below 10K - aluminium for one. This is for a different type of superconductor that can be turned on and off with a magnetic field.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Not quite in the usable temp for engineering yet but definitely on the right path. And a wee bit less sketchy than the last one. That combine with the progress is fusion reactors. We have a bright future in energy ahead of us (but pretty grim everywhere else)

  • LostXOR@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Very cool, I didn’t know a toggleable superconductor was even possible. With all this research into superconductivity it’s only a matter of time before a room-temperature superconductor is found.