• Evia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A cultural disease that would be inhibited by strong gun restrictions

    It raises an interesting point: if the US cracked down super hard on guns but didn’t address the underlying social problems, would people just turn to a different type of violence? Whst would that be? Would you suddenly get all of the would-be shooters committing acid attacks instead?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Before or after the civil war you’d get for trying to disarm a population with more guns than people?

      In any event, if you assume it happened magically you’d probably just get mass stabbings that are, at least, easier to stop and have lower body counts.

      God, just imagine if all the gun fetishists became knife fetishists overnight, they’re already creepy enough.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One argument I’ve seen against gun restrictions is that you’d be more reliant on the police force which is largely a corrupt gang of stupid bullies with both guns and the impunity to commit murder. I’m for enacting stronger restrictions but this point is difficult for me to refute.