sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agoApple demands EU repeal the Digital Markets Actarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgapple@lemdro.idhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1132arrow-down1external-linkApple demands EU repeal the Digital Markets Actarstechnica.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square22linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgapple@lemdro.idhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareHotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up99arrow-down2·5 days agoIt’s somehow funny that Apple has been permanently complaining about European laws, but can easily comply with Chinese censorship rules. Tim Cook literally sold the company to an autocratic regime.
minus-squarecornshark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days agoComplying with censorship laws doesn’t threaten their income or monopoly does it?
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoNot complying with our rules and losing access to our market entirely will most certainly threaten their income or monopoly even more.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoYou’re comparing morality with revenue. Those are very different things.
It’s somehow funny that Apple has been permanently complaining about European laws, but can easily comply with Chinese censorship rules. Tim Cook literally sold the company to an autocratic regime.
Complying with censorship laws doesn’t threaten their income or monopoly does it?
Not complying with our rules and losing access to our market entirely will most certainly threaten their income or monopoly even more.
You’re comparing morality with revenue. Those are very different things.