Can you prove you aren’t a Chinese propaganda parrot? What you are doing is just deflecting as all these alt accounts have been doing here on Lemmy for a long time… and that’s a huge red flag lit up in the night sky. There is ample evidence from multiple reliable sources.

’m not arguing the part about China.

All you do is trying to deflect the topic from China to something else.

There is also a video on social media about this. Questionable are only such comments trying to whitewash Chinese Transnational Repression.

They seem to create a European payment ecosystem for all use cases imo. As the article says,

… to progressively deliver seamless cross-border payments (peer-to-peer, in-store and online) across Europe …

My understanding is that they are also open for future members in the alliance.

What has this to do with the linked article’s topic?

Some attempts to engage in whataboutism is almost hilarious.

If you’re with the government they literally might not issue it, due to a bunch of incidents where corrupt officials fled with a bunch of money they got through corruption.

Travel bans - and exit bans even for foreigners - in China apply to citizens far beyond those who are “with the government” and might be further restricted due to new laws recently introduced. And that’s even the better part of your ml comment.

There are more countries than just one that no longer want to support the UN. These are particularly the U.S., China, and Russia. They all three have no interest in human rights.

This is not true. There have been subcontractors in Italy, and these contractors have been employing illegal Chinese migrants as we know.

Italian fashion brands have been becoming under heavy pressure over probes by Italian authorities because of labour abuse and exploitation of Chinese migrant workers at subcontractors’ workshops on Italian soil, where the brands produced some of their products. It’s supposedly easier to produce in China, where labour laws are much weaker and workers’ rights are de-facto non-existent.

This effects not only Gucci but more or less all Italian brands.

Italian fashion brands have been becoming under heavy pressure over probes by Italian authorities because of labour abuse and exploitation of Chinese migrant workers at subcontractors’ workshops on Italian soil, where the brands produced some of their products. It’s supposedly easier to produce in China, where labour laws are much weaker and workers’ rights are de-facto non-existent.

This effects not only Gucci but more or less all Italian brands.

[Edit typo.]

… not even the US government claims it was genocide.

This is wrong.

Uyghur Genocide (links to the U.S. House)

The last entry is from 21 September 2026,

Today, Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) of the Select Committee on China (SCC) and SCC member Congressman Tom Suozzi (D-NY) led a resolution marking the eighth anniversary of the forcible disappearance of Dr. Gulshan Abbas by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Dr. Abbas, a Uyghur medical doctor who was sentenced in 2019 during a secret trial to a 20-year prison term because her Uyghur American sister, criticized the CCP at a public event in the United States. The resolution calls on the Trump administration to prioritize Dr. Abbas’s immediate and unconditional release.

You find more across the web from very reliable sources. Just stay away from your Chinese propaganda slop.

Despite being against the law, the 996 working culture is still common in China

… For the past few years, the Chinese government has attempted to stamp out “996”, including by outlawing it in 2021. That year, tech giants including TikTok parent company ByteDance and Tencent also tried to halt “996” after a 22-year-old woman at e-commerce firm Pingduoduo reportedly collapsed to her death on her way home from work past midnight.

But intense overtime has remained a common practice in China. The reasons are complex, including a lack of enforcement of the labour law and the country’s low minimum wages, according to researchers and executives interviewed for this report …

There is ample evidence that Chinese workers have practically no rights, even though the official law and political rhetoric may tell you otherwise.

Take it for whatever you want, but the comments are completely unrelated to the article’s content. This is satirical.

Most comments in this thread so far are completely out of touch and have nothing to do with the article.

The effort may be valid, the problem here is the proposer. Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega is not exactly famous for respecting human rights in his own country …

Has anyone mentioned that the SCMP is a propaganda outlet under the Chinese party-state’s disinformation regime?

@Cowbee@lemmy.ml

Not that I think you will listen, but do yourself a favor and stay away from wherever you get this stuff.

@Cowbee@lemmy.ml

Have you now found a fabricated data pretending that “wages for working people have skyrocketed” in China? The most important thing in your comment is that you share an image, but not the link.

To help you out:

Between the 1980s and to the mid-2020s,

• the bottom-50%'s share of China’s wealth has decreased from 16% to 6%
• the bottom-50%'s share of China’s income has decreased from 25% to 13%

In the same period,

• the top-1%'s share of China’s wealth has increased from 15% to more than 30%
• the top-1% share of China’s income has increased from 6% to 16%

China’s richest 10% now own almost 70% of the countries wealth, and they earn 44% of the income.

Inequality levels in China are equal to those in the United States in the meantime.

In European countries and other democracies like Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, the inequality is much lower.

You can look up the data here.

The situation in China gets worse, as the county’s gig economy nears half the workforce while worker protections lag behind. There is ample evidence for that.

Hasn’t also China been reiterating its stance on renaming locations in neighbouring countries such as in India’s Arunachal Pradesh, calling the region “Zangnan” and asserting it as part of its territory? The same happens with some regions in the South China sea.

You literally say that “these sources are unreliable.”

So what is a reliable source regarding this issue in your opinion?