• 1.98K Posts
  • 545 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2025

help-circle



  • This is normal capitalism 101, a principle we demanded China to follow to get access to our market.

    This is an overly simplified narrative, and it is not ‘normal capitalism’.

    Chinese carmakers benefit from unfair state subsidies to say the least, and there has been strong evidence for forced labour conditions in Chinese companies. Brazil sued China carmaker BYD over ‘slave-like’ conditions just to name a more recent example. The Brazilian prosecutors say two of BYD contractors in Brazil (where BYD opened a factory) were responsible for human trafficking and conditions “analogous to slavery” at a factory construction site in the country.

    China is also heavily opposing any transparency, including the supply chain law introduced (and watered down in the meantime) by the EU. The conclusion here is that China is not a trusted partner, at least not under the current government.

    Did coerced labour build your car?

    Thousands of cars ship out of factories every day. But at the other end of the production line, workers are shipped in – thousands of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and Kyrgyz every year – from Xinjiang, the western region at the centre of a long-running human rights crisis.

    Moved as part of a labour transfer scheme that experts call forced labour, these ethnic minorities are coercively recruited by the Chinese state to travel thousands of miles and fill the manufacturing jobs that recent Chinese graduates have spurned. An investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has found more than 100 brands whose products have been made, in part or whole, by workers moved under this system.


































  • Brazil sues China carmaker BYD over ‘slave-like’ conditions

    Brazilian prosecutors are suing Chinese electric vehicle (EV) giant BYD and two of its contractors, saying they were responsible for human trafficking and conditions “analogous to slavery” at a factory construction site in the country.

    Did coerced labour build your car?

    Thousands of cars ship out of factories every day. But at the other end of the production line, workers are shipped in – thousands of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and Kyrgyz every year – from Xinjiang, the western region at the centre of a long-running human rights crisis.

    Moved as part of a labour transfer scheme that experts call forced labour, these ethnic minorities are coercively recruited by the Chinese state to travel thousands of miles and fill the manufacturing jobs that recent Chinese graduates have spurned. An investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has found more than 100 brands whose products have been made, in part or whole, by workers moved under this system.


  • Defence or Welfare? Europe Can Afford Both, and Must

    This is a highly biased article with little content. The article links to a couple of other media reports, but the author admits that increased military spending will “likely” result in a further erosion of the decades-old European social compact. I very much doubt that the author has had a look into the budget plan of a single EU member. They mention not a single number in the whole article, no research, it’s just a rant with a bold headline that serves a particular narrative.

    What makes the whole thing worse is the sentence:

    Europe’s leaders have decided to embrace the sort of massive ramp-up in military spending that so often serves as the prelude to war.

    No, the current ‘ramp-up’ of military spending is certainly not ‘the prelude of war’ - simply because the war is already here. It has been happening for more than three years with military attacks on Ukraine and what is sometimes called a ‘hybrid war’ against European countries such as a recent arson attack on a restaurant in Estonia ordered by Russian intelligence .

    I don’t see what’s wrong if the European countries spend “3.5 percent of their respective GDPs on core military spending, and another 1.5 percent on security and miscellaneous other expenditures designed to harden economies and infrastructure against cyberattacks, people trafficking, and additional risks and perceived risks to NATO economies.”

    Estonia, for example, has been spending more than 5% of its GDP for defense already before the Nato summit, and I argue that this has not so much to do with ‘appeasing’ Trump than with its common border with Russia.