Political violence can assume a lot of forms: from terrorism to lobbying. The political violence also is being contained by certain rules: the violence couldn’t be executed on certain territories, against certain groups (politicians, policemen); could be executed by legal authorities, etc.(see state of exception).
The spike of political violence is not a disease, it’s a symptom of something wrong - that some of these rules are being violated aggressively or the violence is being executed which is not acknowledged as political.
It doesn’t look like we’re beyond the point of no return of these rules to be rewritten, but we’re very close to it.
Your personal Russian bot here.
Political violence can assume a lot of forms: from terrorism to lobbying. The political violence also is being contained by certain rules: the violence couldn’t be executed on certain territories, against certain groups (politicians, policemen); could be executed by legal authorities, etc.(see state of exception).
The spike of political violence is not a disease, it’s a symptom of something wrong - that some of these rules are being violated aggressively or the violence is being executed which is not acknowledged as political.
It doesn’t look like we’re beyond the point of no return of these rules to be rewritten, but we’re very close to it.