Worth noting that the Chinese ambassador also called it the Malvinas throughout, not the Falklands.

  • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How long before the US decides to coup Argentina and sets up some spy base or black site on the islands, if they don’t have one already?

    and how would that be affected by the brits owning it?

    as a communsist, the thing i care about the most is people and the people of the falklands overwhelmingly want to be part of this hell hole for some fucking reason
    and given that the islands were uninhabited before they were colonised, there is no justification for suddnly making them argentinian

    • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not like those people have any more claim to the islands than anyone else. Who cares that they were uninhabited beforehand or whatever. The here and now is that Britain is drilling for resources there.

      The UK is 11th in terms of median wealth, Argentina is 119th. Should oil money off the coast of Argentina benefit Argentinians, or British people?

      • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not like those people have any more claim to the islands than anyone else.

        There is no reason whatsoever to override self determination because There were no indigenous people there when it was settled. So the people who live there come first.

      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        they have claim to the islands because they fucking live there dude

        because i’m sensing a “you’re just a british nationalist” coming in the immediate future, i’ll just make my position clear
        if the islanders decided that they would rather be argentinian, i would wholeheartedly support argentina’s claim to the islands

        • Staines [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This. People first. Peoples right to self determination and democracy from top to bottom in society is paramount. As communists, that principle is absolute.

          • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re acting like the Argentinian government is gonna massacre them the second power is transferred. Probably nothing would change but Argentina would get the profit from oil and tourism.

            Like Argentinians are not on average wealthy people. The British people living on those islands probably have it way better than most of the people in Argentina. It’s kind of gross.

            • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re acting like the Argentinian government is gonna massacre them the second power is transferred.

              Historically, how have occupying powers dealt with local populations that overwhelmingly don’t want them there?

              • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah those occupying powers like the British Empire. You’re gonna act like Alberto Fernandez is gonna massacre some people living on an island lol.

                • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A hostile local population is an obstacle to resource exploitation and capitalists will remove that obstacle one way or another.

                  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    resource extraction near some town? And they’re not like colnized oppressed people they’re just some probably comfortable British people. They’re not in some anti-colonial struggle give me a break.

                • Staines [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Idealist nonsense, says the person who wants to divide up all natural resources equally into amorphous national state boundaries regardless of the wishes of the people who live there, until all national states have equal populations, areas, and access to natural wealth?

                  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re literally just spewing more idealist nonsense. You know that countries are a thing that still exist right? Either Argentina gets to benefit from the islands, or Britain (lmao) does. You’re saying the British should benefit because they colonized some islands hundreds of years ago and there’s a couple thousand people there. If there was 1 person living in the Falklands, would that justify oil and gas drilling and a British military outpost?

        • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a point where it tips from “just some people living on an island” and becomes “Britain maintaining an imperial outpost for resource extraction”.

      • Not like those people have any more claim to the islands than anyone else. Who cares that they were uninhabited beforehand or whatever.

        I would absolutely say the first group of people to settle a previously uninhabited area have more claim than anyone else.

        “Native Americans have no more claim to Ohio than anyone else” yeah except being the first people to live there