Davriellelouna@lemmy.worldBanneddeleted by creator to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoSo big, so beautiful: Fox News ignores the critics and champions Trump’s billwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1120arrow-down14cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1116arrow-down1external-linkSo big, so beautiful: Fox News ignores the critics and champions Trump’s billwww.theguardian.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.worldBanneddeleted by creator to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square12linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago therefore had no journalistic obligations (I.e. they could say whatever they wanted). There is literally no such thing in the eyes of the law. They could say whatever they want whenever they want. journalism has legal protections and responsibilities that are upheld/enforced in courts. No. It does not. The first amendment does not say “if you are a legally recognized journalist”. It applies to everybody.
There is literally no such thing in the eyes of the law. They could say whatever they want whenever they want.
No. It does not. The first amendment does not say “if you are a legally recognized journalist”. It applies to everybody.