The fact that the Abbot was an exact doppelganger for the Doctor has always been an unexplained mystery. Steven even examined the Abbot’s corpse up close and still believed him to have been the Doctor. But since the release of “The Massacre of St Bartholomew’s Eve”, we have learned new info about the Doctor that casts this mystery in a new light:
-
The Doctor can sometimes subconsciously “choose” their new face when regenerating, as in the cases of the Curator Doctor resembling the Fourth Doctor, the Twelfth Doctor resembling Lobus Caecilius, and the Fourteenth Doctor resembling the Tenth Doctor.
-
The First Doctor was not, in fact, the first Doctor, but a regeneration, with tge Doctor having had many unknown incarnations and unknown adventures prior to this one.
With this in mind, how likely would we say it is that a prior incarnation of the Doctor (the Fugitive Doctor, for instance) actually met the Abbot on a hitherto-unseen adventure, and that when the Doctor regenerated into their so-called “First Doctor” incarnation, they “chose” the Abbot’s face? And if so… why? The “First” Doctor came after the Division gave the Doctor a total memory wipe. The Doctor therefore shouldn’t have been able to remember the Abbot at all. So if they still did, and if they “chose” the Abbot’s face, then the Abbot must have been very significant indeed for the Doctor. But why?
There is a short story - I can’t recall the title - in which we find that the Abbot is actually the Dalek duplicate of the First from The Chase, revived and sent through time.
Can you recall anything that might help me google it?
It was a relatively recently published one - last 3 years or so. It started with the encounter on Mechanus, centred on the duplicate. I don’t recall the reason that the duplicate ended up in France, but I believe that it had any memory of its origin wiped.
The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether it is a BF audio. Not a short story, but a short trip.