cm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 4 months agoAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comexternal-linkmessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1487arrow-down15cross-posted to: Obviously@europe.pubfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1482arrow-down1external-linkAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 4 months agomessage-square65linkfedilinkcross-posted to: Obviously@europe.pubfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·4 months ago Well, this kind of AI won’t ever be useful as a programmer It already is.
minus-squarechildOfMagentalinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 months agoYou mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months agoAh - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoI explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·4 months ago It’s great as autocomplete. I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoDid you even read my earlier comment?
It already is.
You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
Thanks for clarifying.
I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
Did you even read my earlier comment?