cm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 1 年前AI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comexternal-linkmessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1490arrow-down15cross-posted to: Obviously@europe.pubfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1485arrow-down1external-linkAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 1 年前message-square65linkfedilinkcross-posted to: Obviously@europe.pubfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squarechildOfMagentalinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前 It’s great as autocomplete. I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Did you even read my earlier comment?
You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
Thanks for clarifying.
I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
Did you even read my earlier comment?