A Tesla influencer randomly caught his odometer double-counting mileage on video. Wild.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Amazing the Tesla dev team that made this was dumb enough to actually put it in the UI in real-time. Just updates the mileage behind the scenes in data, then only update the UI slowly along the way. Not actually double counting in the UI visibly fast lmaoo

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    6 hours ago

    One of the drivers mentioned in this article has a youtube video showing his odometer going from 124,999 to 125,001, completely skipping 125,000. One of the comments asks him to reach out to the law firm handling the class action lawsuit, but the owner replies with:

    Happy to help if you’re interested in paying a consultation fee for my time-- but otherwise these actions only enrich the law firms and I’m not volunteering to do that.

    This mindset is so frustrating. Class action lawsuits are legit, they hold companies accountable and they pay out cash to people. To say that they only enrich law firms is not just wrong, but I think actually harmful to repeat like he has, especially in the great age of enshittification where everything tries to force binding arbitration agreements into every contract and agreement.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      I’d be a lot of money that the excuse is just a lie he thinks make him sound like the good person he knows he is not.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The point is that the company being sued has to pay those millions in the first place. The law firm does pay itself rather well for that work, but I’d consider class actions to be one of the more defensible legal actions.

    • Diurnambule
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It predict when the Tesla is going to fauk and void the guarantee ?

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I admit I didn’t watch the video — I’ve trained YouTube’s algorithm well at this point and don’t want Tesla content — but what the fuck is a predictive odometer? The tires roll a certain distance. We’ve had odometers for like 75 years.

    • ogeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The article mentions that Tesla is kind of justifying the behavior by saying it is based on energy consumption and some other bullshit. The expectation according to SAE, which I find very interesting, is to be in a range of +/- 4% and for GPS enabled odometers+/- 2.5%, Tesla is missing the mark for at least 36%.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You’d think they would make it increment every half mile instead of doing something stupid like this.

        • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah if you’re gonna do a fraud at least put the minimum thought into it. It’s disrespectful is what it is. Gives honest grifters a bad name

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 minutes ago

            Except in this case they’re defrauding customers instead of corporate like in Office Space… not quite as fun.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 hours ago

    A product that has a warranty which depends on any “predictive” metric is probably a scam, tbh.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Their insurance is (was?) kind of like that as well if you get the saftey score one. While some things are more general and concrete like following distance, time of day driving, they have one for forward collision warnings.

      I’m not sure how much time you’ve spent in a Tesla, but that system is notorious for going off incorrectly. It’s specifically really bad with parked cars on the side of the road on turns. So you’re driving along a city street with cars parked on the side and it goes off and now your insurance premiums are more expensive.

      I don’t think you could find a single Tesla owner who hasn’t had multiple false warnings, and consistently in certain circumstances.

      So someone of course starts a lawsuit and Tesla initially defends itself, but just last week or something like that, it’s no longer part of the safety score

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Seriously. This dude is delusional.

      The law firm going after Tesla for this offered to represent him via a class action, and this idiot has the gall to ask the law firm for payment?

      The world would be better off if his Tesla self-drove itself into a wall. Ideally with him inside.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Can’t argue with that XD

      His main deal is that he does Tesla stuff. His website is “Tesla Pittsburgh,” so yeah, he’s a Tesla guy.