A German experiment has found that people are likely to continue working full-time even if they receive no-strings-attached universal basic income payments.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250412140637/https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/11/health/germany-universal-basic-income-study-intl-scli-wellness/index.html


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Aka the same line companies used when some places tried and succeeded in raising wages. Turns out the prices didn’t go up, only the spending power of those with those wages, who bought more stuff. Some people have a beef against the idea of any sort of welfare net because it might be abused. Then try to make it less abusable, or better yet, try it and see what works, don’t say “we tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas.”

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some people have a beef against the idea of any sort of welfare net because it might be abused.

        Yeah, if by “abused” you mean working-class people getting “uppity” because they actually manage to get ahead for once.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just a side note, if you want people to even consider your point of view, don’t call them idiots. Off to blocklist you go! Bye.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I did want to and as you can see in a sibling thread, we actually did discuss with someone who didn’t decide that calling people idiots just because you don’t have anything smarter to say is appropriate.

      • Gronk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Artificially inflating prices to cancel out UBI would create economic incentive to undercut those corporations in a free market.

        Government intervention could also be used in a less free market to ensure subsistence items aren’t artificially inflated, after that who cares if some company inflates their price? Go work if you want a new shiny thing.

        You know what’s really good? Having a safety net to prevent the lowest suffering class of our society dying from things that we’ve been able to prevent for decades.

        Having reduced crime because people aren’t fighting over scraps.

        Having more mobility in society so people can pursure careers and education that aligns with their own self fulfilment goals.

        Stop fighting against a better world for all of us please.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Artificially inflating prices to cancel out UBI would create economic incentive to undercut those corporations in a free market.

          That hasn’t worked historically for any reason and UBI is not so magical that the whole of capitalism will sit on its ass and stop doing what it’s doing.

          Government intervention could also be used in a less free market to ensure subsistence items aren’t artificially inflated, after that who cares if some company inflates their price? Go work if you want a new shiny thing.

          Pretty much the same response as above, good luck with that.

          You know what’s really good? Having a safety net to prevent the lowest suffering class of our society dying from things that we’ve been able to prevent for decades.

          Having reduced crime because people aren’t fighting over scraps.

          Having more mobility in society so people can pursure careers and education that aligns with their own self fulfilment goals.

          Fully agree, I don’t see how that relates to UBI, though.

          Stop fighting against a better world for all of us please.

          I’m not, I’m just trying to explain that while UBI sounds good on paper, it can’t work and never will. It’s free money for everyone who owns capital, be it landlord or huge chains. They’ll have your UBI, you’ll have nothing and you’ll pay for it from your taxes, because rich don’t pay their taxes, definitely not the amount they should. So, where in that is your better world?

          • Gronk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I get the point youre trying to make but a UBI is still a step in the right direction, I’d rather take the gamble and pay my taxes on it than have what we do now.

            At the very least it would expose a lot of the systemic issues you’ve mentioned to the broader public, and hopefully that would lead to meaningful change.

            I’d prefer a world where people are guaranteed the basics to survive without having to capitulate to the system, we have the technlogical progress and productive capabilities to do this we’re just not there in terms of societal progression.

            And I’m going to continue advocating for that world, whether it’s UBI or unbiased infrastructure and systems to provide people with basic needs

            • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’d prefer a world where people are guaranteed the basics to survive without having to capitulate to the system, we have the technlogical progress and productive capabilities to do this we’re just not there in terms of societal progression.

              I get that and I agree, but I don’t think giving everyone money that can be stolen by the usual suspects is the solution. Safety nets are the way to go, not UBI.

              If someone some day proves me wrong, I’ll be happy to admit I was wrong, though I’m not gonna support UBI until that happens, because of the issues I outlined.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        LOL, says the guy whose previous comment was nothing but a personal attack. You’re just throwing a tantrum because you have no rebuttal.